LordPartyTime (1786)
4 SFW Posts | 174 Space Comments | Favorites | RSS Feed



Registered 2007-12-04 20:54:51

Comment Karma: -5
Featured Comments: 0
Member of :

Recent Comments from LordPartyTime

  • Comment on Avril Lavigne Has Mountie Friends (2009-02-01 14:40:34)
    I could see this developing into a pron really really easily.
  • Comment on Avril Lavigne Is Nicole Kidman (2009-02-01 14:39:20)
    rofl, is changing pages of Avril taking up too much of your wasting time on the internet time? Maybe MCS isn't the right place for you.
  • Comment on I wasn't a total failure (2009-01-25 18:13:02)
    Bush did a hell of a lot better than any of you could ever have done, and Obama will do the same, if to a higher (probably) degree. I personally voted for Bush, but did not vote for Obama (but not in the same election, just had to clarify so some of you fucktards won't be saying 'haha, you voted for Bush even when he wasn't a valid presidential candidate'). But guess what; I'm a fucking American and I have a president. Just because I didn't vote him in doesn't mean that he's not the president and doesn't deserve my respect. Hindsight has 20/20 vision. People looking into the future do not have the luxury of knowing in such perfect detail everything about the future the way that you know absolutely everything there is to know about the past.
  • Comment on Priceless (2008-12-17 21:36:28)
    compasseagle89 You supplied the results of your search (and yes, sadly you forgot to reference your work)in support of someone who was making an incorrect assumption. That makes you, your support, and your views as expressed by your linked support, erroneous. What makes you the final arbiter of what exact verbage constitutes a 'myth' or not? I may have heard the 'myth' just as the picture describes the situation above: bore sight causes barrel explosion, or some derivision thereof. As you stated, it doesn't matter: you supported an argument which postulated that this situation could not happen based on incomplete testing. Finger in shotgun vs bore sight in high-powered rifle: obviously not the same thing, quit trying to apply your incomplete mythbusters logic to a legitimate situation. I'm not acting like an ass, I'm just cheerily showing you to be the true incompetent that you are. I'll be the first to admit that I have a smaller than average penis, and I don't even use it to its full advantage. However, it's already gotten more pussy than yours ever will.
  • Comment on Priceless (2008-12-17 17:30:27)
    WistfulD I personally haven't blown up a barrel because I treat guns very carefully, so I don't have any peronal picture documentation to provide. However, I humbly submit images 1, 2 and 3 shown at the top of this page for your consideration. Angry I am not, derisive I am. The appaling lack of topic-specific knowledge that some posters (bicoid and compasseagle89) present in their statements is more than enough for me to curl my lip and sneer. I'll not claim to be an expert on firearms, but I will not open my mouth and prove myself a fool.
  • Comment on Priceless (2008-12-17 14:58:48)
    .270 = even better "The load that made the .270 Winchester's reputation was the 130 grain spitzer bullet at a muzzle velocity (MV) of 3140 fps" - http://www.chuckhawks.com/270win.htm
  • Comment on Patton pisses on Germany (2008-12-17 14:56:22)
    Kommisar I'd piss in a public area all over your bound face and body, then kill you, then piss on your corpse.
  • Comment on Priceless (2008-12-17 13:49:36)
    By the way, "The .30-06 remains one of the most popular sporting cartridges in the world." came from wiki here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/30-06
  • Comment on Priceless (2008-12-17 13:48:24)
    compasseagle89 It's good to know, then, that everyone who though Mythbusters busted this myth is an ignoramus worthy of internet scorn. "Shotgun with remote control trigger" vs "1. Shiny new, high-powered deer rifle…………..$ 1,200.00" One must take into account muzzle velocity (how fast and how much energy the bullet has upon leaving the barrel) in order to obtain an accurate comparison: 12-gauge shotgun (most typical shotgun type, since you failed to clarify which type) with a slug (yes, there are many different shot types, however "amie hammered a bullet into the end of the barrel" indicates a slug was used, since you can't hammer shot) has a muzzle velocity of about 1600 feet per second -http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shotgun "The .30-06 remains one of the most popular sporting cartridges in the world." so we'll take the 30-06 as the supplied deer rifle. "Winchester USA Centerfire Rifle Ammunition USA3006, 30-06 Springfield, Full Metal Jacket, 147 GR, 3020 fps" - http://www.ableammo.com/catalog/product_info.php?products_id=74272 So we see here that a standard deer rifle with a 147 grain bullet has almost double the muzzle velocity of said shotgun slug. So, you permutate the transfer of kinetic energy, and you'll come to the conclusion that Mythbusters, and you, are both WRONG. This type of thing can and does split rifle barrels.
  • Comment on Priceless (2008-12-16 21:30:59)
    No. l2read.
  • Comment on Priceless (2008-12-16 21:20:31)
    @ eviljim (I assume you'll take Magnus's suggestion) I don't ascribe to your school of pandering responses to MCS subscribers personal feelings. It's not hateful, but it is derisive of someone's ignorance in relation to firearms, and if Mythbusters is ignorant enough to say that this type of situation cannot occur, then bollocks to them, bollocks to bicoid for listening to them, and bollocks to you for being Bicoids mommy. As for the sand, there is none, but my giant epeen is definitely enshrouded in some lovely meat curtains right about now.
  • Comment on Priceless (2008-12-16 17:58:18)
    You'll notice that nothing indicates that a finger was used to stop said bullet. In fact, it shows a legitimate blockage to the barrel, not random debris or someone's appendage. So, if Mythbusters was so narrow minded as to test something with device A and say that the result shown above is impossible to achieve with not only device A but also devices B through Z, then Mythbusters is almost as stupid as you are, Bicoid.
  • Comment on Obama Warcraft Achievement (2008-11-13 16:43:56)
    Achievements are too in Wow. In fact, I got this achievement just last week.
  • Comment on How Come He Gets Horses? (2008-10-07 13:29:26)
    I don't give a damn what anyone says to it, but I voted for him. Both times. Would I do it again? Yes. Go ahead, flame. I don't care. You don't matter. See, your vote didn't matter, and neither do your opinions. I do like how his head seems to be at the end of an incredibly long neck, or that it's attatched at the side of his face. Funny pic and quote, very much lol.
  • Comment on Batman's Various Alignments (2008-09-24 12:43:55)
    Who else would kick a man for eating ice cream? Chuck Norris, of course! But it wouldnt be a regular kick, oh no. It would have to be a round-house kick to the face!
Previous page | Next page