garbledxmission (1295)
82 SFW Posts | 890 Space Comments | Favorites | RSS Feed



Registered 2007-10-02 14:56:55

Comment Karma: -1
Featured Comments: 0
Member of :

Recent Comments from garbledxmission

  • Comment on Future might be like this (2009-04-11 02:37:10)
    Sorry, belligerent. I still think the wookie is a big, furry, nerfherder.
  • Comment on Future might be like this (2009-04-11 02:28:38)
    Die, this entire argument was engineered to turn you on. That's why I'm doing it. Wookie is too short bus for me to actually give a shit what he thinks, it's all for you bebe. The fact that he's an idiot and wrong just makes it sweeter. I have two loves. My Stacey and you my Austrian Angel. Your beligerant nature just fuels the fire. heh hehehehhehehehe. Stacey wants to meet you in person.
  • Comment on Future might be like this (2009-04-11 02:23:40)
    Wook, quit using the argument and i'll quit accusing you of it. You've done it enough times to accuse you of using it as your primary mode of attack in an argument. Has nothing to do with my love of a particular argument style. You keep using it. Period. Perhaps if you truly understood it you'd stop going there everytime someone disagrees with you. 1) Way to jump a century or so between the creation of the land vehicle and modern vehicles. BTW, if you'd actually done any research, you'd know Ford did advocate the theory of the cheapest, simplest vehicle for the public. Even down to the color. "they can have whatever color they want, so long as it's black." Speaks volumes. 2) Of course the basis for your argument doesn't exist! That would make it too easy for anyone to refute your argument that at some time in some future the tech might exist for flying cars to be safe and plentiful for a mankind that may or may not exist! Wow! We've reached a science plateau. Look into it. The science for safe, foolproof flying cars simply doesn't exist and will not feasibly exist for centuries. Get over your Star Trek/Star Wars boner fantasy and let it go. 3) You're right, since we are talking about tech that doesn't exist, let's throw all science out the window and assume, (let's ignore what assuming does), that all the testing would ignore the basic precept of human nature which, despite our relavant tech, has not changed significantly. That people are not arrogant, ignorant morons in general that ignore all safety regulations and requirements. While you are at it, might as well wish for world peace. But you are right, go far enough into the future and who knows where we'll end up. Might as well shit in one hand and wish in another and see which fills up first. 4) Don't call me kiddo. You don't know me, but, given your inane comments, I know you and I can say you are younger than I am and don't have a goddamn clue about what you think you are talking about, young man. Get over it. You've lost this argument. Your continued attempts make you look even more ignorant than you probably are. Tell you what, stick whatever you'd like up your ass. I don't care. I don't have the time to care. You have an outstanding day my young friend. You have a lot to learn about the world you live in.
  • Comment on B61-11 Nuclear Bunker Buster Bomb (2009-04-11 01:54:23)
    @fullofstars so, is your head firmly wedged up your own delusional fantasy ass, or only on days ending in 9?.
  • Comment on Practical Boob Reconnaissance (2009-04-11 01:51:12)
    u know why she keeps biting her lips in these pics? Cause she knows i'll be fucking here in the foreseeable future.
  • Comment on The Face of Meth (2009-04-11 00:18:23)
    @KommissarKvC: Missed you, you little stick bitch. BTW, meth is a drug you moron.
  • Comment on Future might be like this (2009-04-10 23:48:35)
    Oh, and BTW, quit your lame attempts at strawman statements. It makes you look more pathetic than you already are.
  • Comment on Future might be like this (2009-04-10 23:47:46)
    @wookie. Actually, I'm the life of the party when there aren't short busers such as yourself there. To rebut your arguments: 1) I never said they would be built by the lowest bidder. Just like ground vehicles, one would find many levels of flying vehicle quality. That being said, the basic model would be built by the lowest bidder because in every vehicle design from scooters to space shuttles, the lowest bidder inevitably gets the contract. Do some research. 2) They would have safety features. But like I previously stated, (which I'm guessing you either didn't bother to read or are too dense to understand), the technology does not exist, (nor would be viably created in the near or distant feature), to make a foolproof safety feature to prevent the damn thing from falling out of the sky. 3) It would have undergone testing. And the tests would have proven that the average person would not be remotely capable or trustworthy of safely operating said vehicle. Now you're into computer control, something trustworthy only until it malfunctions. Plus the aforementioned needed backups in case of propulsion failure. 4) How far into the future are you talking about? Go far enough and the point is moot. Who knows what kind of tech they will have and how it will be implemented? We were discussing the viability of the design in the forseeable future, i.e. our lifetimes. Now if you want, I can go into exhaustive detail about basic lift/drag ratios, propulsion systems, safety systems, etc., but I'm quite convinced by your pathetic arguments that you don't have a clue. So instead, I'm going to tell you to shut your whore mouth and have a nice day, you donkey rapist.
  • Comment on Riding Dirty (2009-04-10 22:15:07)
    casemods, shut your stupid whore mouth.
  • Comment on IQs by Religion (2009-04-08 01:49:54)
    Glasses don't make you smart, they just make you less blind. Also, they prove that crappy genetics run in the most intelligent of families. My own, on both sides, are both poorly visioned and ridiculously wicked smart, eh? Heh heh. Thanks for the sexy comment. I needed that. Coming from your wickedly puffy lips, (yes I know it was your fingers and not your lips but let me have my fantasies, plus you have very nice lips), it makes me all tingly inside. I am not surprised your parents are docs. In fact, it explains that much more about you. In a good way, mind. As for the arrogant and condescending thing, well...like attracts like is all I could say about that. Did I mention the little woman is as equally outspoken and...how shall I put it...confrontational as you are? Well that explains it. Plus you both like girls from time to time.
  • Comment on B61-11 Nuclear Bunker Buster Bomb (2009-04-08 01:41:47)
    That's "newkewlurrr" to you dammit!
  • Comment on Future might be like this (2009-04-08 01:31:43)
    Sorry, 'reasonable'.
  • Comment on Future might be like this (2009-04-08 01:30:55)
    @wookie_x. It's simple physics. Even if a plane loses all power, it's wing design gives it a resonable chance to land and the passengers to survive. A flying car would, without it's propulsion, essentially be a flying brick. To think it would be remotely safe is retarded at best. Unless you could come up with a foolproof backed up propulsion system, (i.e., it doesn't exist, nor would it ever concieveably within the next few generations at least), you'd be inviting mass disasters on a daily basis. BTW, nice attempt at a strawman argument at the end of your rebuttle. Makes you look like an even bigger ignorant idiot. Even the worst built car is still ON THE FUCKING GROUND YOU ASSHAT. @LukeV1-5. Shut up you moron. No presumptions at all. It could have the most advanced nav system available, (which I am familiar with, having worked with them on military aircraft, along with my DEGREES IN AERONAUTICAL ENGINEERING), doesn't alter one whit the fact that with their drive system inop, they would fall down go BOOM.!
  • Comment on Marvel Zombies vs Army of Darkness goodness! (2009-04-08 01:20:38)
    To die, colombian, sumo. My character's name is dildo douchebaggins. I'm in the far southwest part of the city called Foulkes Village. We are holed up in the Brandon Way Police Dept. Come find me as a player or a zombie. I'll revive those of you that are zombies and show you the ropes. There is a revive point called Fyfehyde Plaza to the North east of the PD where if you sit as a zombie people will revive you. Get the skills free running and weapon skills as a player. As a zed, (zombie), get whatever skills you want. Go to wiki and enter urban dead and there is a whole tutorial about the game.
  • Comment on IQs by Religion (2009-04-08 01:12:12)
    High IQ's, like anything else in life, only do you any kind of good if you are given the proper education, tools and mental training required to make something of it. I have an IQ of 172 and was, fortunately, encouraged and nutured in a way that has allowed me to make some use of it as well as be fairly adept socially. Die, don't sell yourself short, you have, at least in a digital venue, any number of appealing social attributes. All that being said, I firmly believe that IQ testing is not a fully accurate test of an individual's potential from both halves of their brain.
Previous page | Next page