w4rb4dg3r (6722) 12 SFW Posts | 18 Space Comments | Favorites | RSS Feed Registered 2009-01-24 21:04:47 Comment Karma: 8 Featured Comments: 0 Member of :

Recent Comments from w4rb4dg3r

Comment on With all the gun crazy shit going on, tell me your gun experiences (2013-03-23 07:46:40)
Great idea. Until it actually happens. A chainsaw is an ungainly weapon on its best day. A steel pipe or a crowbar can beat a chainsaw based on speed and dexterity. And if you are too squeamish to shoot someone, you are too squeamish to pick bits of intestine out of your hair after you 'accidentally' swiped a chunk out of that burglar's abdomen. And can you imagine how that will stack up in court? The District Attorney will ask what exactly you thought you needed that 'assault weapon chainsaw' for in front of the jury and you will be remanded for psychiatric care until they determine you are not crazy. But someone who would attack another person with a chainsaw MUST be crazy. So you will spend YEARS eating jello and taking the pills they want you to take.
Comment on With all the gun crazy shit going on, tell me your gun experiences (2013-03-23 07:34:33)
I cry bullshit. I can tell you the caliber of every good shot I ever made in my life. You talk about a .227 with a scope? Try again. Unless you are talking about some obscure 5.8 mm or a really old weapon from before the first world war, you made that up. .227 IS the outside diameter of a number of .22 caliber bullets. But they are not ever referred to as .227 and you would know that if you were actually a shooter. And it is PS90. The P90 is the select fire non-legal in the US for civilians version. And NO ONE in the gun industry has used the phrase assault weapon in reference to a semi-automatic rifle. That was some crap Diane Feinstein and her crew cooked up twenty years ago. I asked about this with guys who have been gun salesmen, cops, Immigration and Customs, and soldiers since I was in grade school. They are all 'gunnies' and all agreed that the term 'assault weapon' is a bullshit term of art created by the liberals to scare non-gunnies. Show me one ad from any newspaper or magazine from a reputable gun store or gun manufacturer that uses that phrase. I can tell you I have Field and Stream magazines in boxes going back forty years and there is no mention anywhere in there about an assault weapon until the 86 weapons ban. Now we have youtube video of Diane Feinstein stating explicitly that she wants to pick up "all of the guns". We have video on youtube of multiple other Democrat politicians stating exactly the same thing. We also have the actions of the criminal Cuomo in New York. He falsely declared a State of Urgency and got laws passed at night without public review, which is part of the process by law for legislation in New York State. Three days of public review BEFORE they are voted on. That public review never happened. Now people who have paid for equipment lawfully purchased who still have that equipment after a certain date --- *are subject to the police going to their house and confiscating that equipment and arresting them*. --- What part of that is slipping past your mind? THAT IS THE GOVERNMENT TAKING THEIR GUNS. Enacted in law illegally by a criminal. Are the people who can read newspapers and watch youtube all paranoid or are you just delusional? And there are a large number of conservation agents and game wardens that would prefer that people use a semiautomatic firearm to prevent an animal from being shot in the body cavity but not being immediately felled by the shot from running miles away and then having to suffer through illness and infection and eventually die suffering. A second shot can be a very humane thing if you shoot the animal and for whatever reason the wound is not immediately incapacitating. I know two gun shop owners that refuse to sell bow hunting equipment because of that very fact. The arrow wounds the animal and it will be fatal, just maybe not for a few days. Both of them were game wardens in Louisiana and told me wretched stories about finding deer rotting while still alive and with maggots in wounds and being eaten by ants while they were still alive because they couldn't garner the strength to get up. And folding stocks and adjustable stocks are quite useful for transport. Some rifles with longer barrels simply won't fit in a compact car trunk or even most rifle cases without the stock folded. I have a .308 that simply won't fit in the trunk of a Chevy Camaro. The fact that you couldn't imagine a legal use for folding stock weapons is a reflection upon you and not someone who would like to be able to shorten his rifle so it fits in his safe better or so he can put it in the same hard case he keeps his shotgun in. As far as just a few bullets goes, there are a whole long list of reasons why someone might need more than a handful of bullets. Maybe there are five or six guys trying to break in...? Maybe the guys are not deterred by the first shot, or the second, or the third....? I would have to guess that you don't live near any areas with gang activity. You would not ever have brought that subject up at all. Diane Feinstein on youtube: www.youtube.com/watch?v=NRblw29I14U
Comment on With all the gun crazy shit going on, tell me your gun experiences (2013-03-23 05:58:11)
Well Here we go. 1. No one under the age of 21 in the United States may own or carry a handgun legally. (They broke a law) 2. Killing people is illegal. (they broke a law) 3. Robbing people is illegal. (they broke a law) 4. Threatening someone with a deadly weapon is illegal. (they broke a law) 5. Assault and battery is illegal. (they broke a law) 6. Leaving the scene of a crime is illegal. (they broke a law) 7. The gun was no doubt stolen. (they broke a law) So what law would they decide to follow? Seriously. You have a supposed 10 year old and a supposed 15 year old who are fucked up enough that killing an infant is something they choose to do. Why does no one look at the family situation and the school situation to actually solve the problem? If they had tied the kid to the front bumper of a car would it be a car problem? If they had used a chainsaw would it have been different? An electric drill? A hammer? A baseball bat? A steak knife? Why or why not?