Rineholt (4282) 1 SFW Posts | 17 Space Comments | Favorites | RSS Feed 30, Single and hating it, An Electrician, Lives in a flat in or around Baltimore - Maryland, into Hard - Classic - Altern. rock and electronic/dance and rap and ect., am kind of a movie whore in general, into cars a bit, and I'm pretty much a corny goofball nice guy that is an oddity to the social norm and standardized gamer geek format. Notification Status: Registered 2008-07-30 21:11:43 Comment Karma: 0 Featured Comments: 0 Member of :

Recent Comments from Rineholt

Comment on fly bride 2 (2010-02-12 22:16:08)
Not sure but this looks both in style and its graphic nature like work from "Heavy Metal" magazine. Also...EWWWWWW
Comment on Tim Burton's Alice in Wonderland (2009-06-23 18:40:56)
I can't believe no one has said they noticed that Alice looks like she will be played by the ultra attractive Anne Hathaway. om nomity nom
Comment on aiste clan clan (2009-05-31 23:15:05)
Also the only one to get really neck-ed in one of the later episodes. Dangerous yes but worth the risk. Keep food near by an you should be ok.
Comment on Rusting Tank (2009-05-30 01:47:39)
Check my wording again. I said the M1A2 has the "Most Advanced Computer Integrated Gyro" for its main gun targeting system. Not the entire tank. Everywhere you are better at something your lacking elsewhere. This go's for all things and the difference maker is which half is greater. My money is on shooting with a high efficiency on the move, in combat circumstances, in day or night. M1A1 can do that. Oh and with the Germans thing. If you're out of fuel you can't move. If you can't move you can't adjust position or pull back to re-arm ammo when you run out from killing other tanks. Worse than that and more likely to happen first is you're inablity to move gets you an ass or side shot and dead or artillery shelled, or smoked by aircraft.
Comment on Rusting Tank (2009-05-30 01:33:03)
Since we are going to be a little to literal... Of course all tanks can fire on the move but they all can't do so with great accuracy and that is not even accounting for uneven terrain. When I said stop to fire I was pointing to the issue of the inability to produce accurate fire without stopping not firing at all.
Comment on danica patrick - red carpet (2009-05-30 01:10:53)
As beautiful as she is fast...and thats alot.
Comment on Rusting Tank (2009-05-28 23:05:31)
Also a point of note. The M1A2 has the most advanced computer integrated gyro stabilizer mated to its main gun and drive system. This means the M1A2, is as far as I know, the only main battle tank in the world that can fire "accurately" on the move, on rough ground, and at about 35mph to 40mph. All other tanks I've ever seen tech. data on, including Challenger and German Leopard, have to stop to fire. Even then the Leopard has the biggest gun and range over challenger but a tank at rest is a dead tank.
Comment on Rusting Tank (2009-05-28 22:55:10)
Ah yes but let us all remember a lesson proven in/by history. In WW2 German Tiger, Panther, and King Tiger tanks were far outnumbered by Sherman and T-35/85 tanks in nearly every engagement. Look up the "battle of the bulge" for an example. Tiger crews killed allied tanks at nearly a 4 or 5 to 1 ratio if not more. They only stopped cause they ran outa gas. My point being quantity is not better than quality and in tank warfare the past has proven that painfully true.
Comment on Another Free Country Courtesy of USA (2009-04-20 00:57:56)
@Anto123: Meaning no disrespect. Your post is a straw-man statement irrelevant to the topic picture and discussion. My personal admittance to any other opinions or facts outside the topic of debate has no bearing on the truth of fact and information of what was stated. Now while on topic, you have stated your self to the support of my evidence in your own words and opinion, that regardless of intent or what have you, self appointed democracy in the above nations "have been just an accidental byproduct." Which is a positive far cry better then Totalitarianism, Fascism, and Dictatorship.
Comment on Another Free Country Courtesy of USA (2009-04-19 01:06:03)
Final in my long winded run... As to saving Russia at one time yes we most certainly did. Right along side England on D-Day and lets not forget FDR.'s lend/lease act to them. Prior to Pearl Harbor and U.S. major intervention England was target practice for buzz bombs so Germany had no real western front worries and Rommel was stomping around with Africa taken care of so that leaves Russia. Hitler hated Russia and broke treaty with them when he thought it was safe. Operation Barbarossa was the largest military attack of WW2 and saw the Nazi's steam roll the unprepared Soviets. This was all out attack with all the stops pulled and it stopped for 2 reasons. Russian seasonal change is one, but come late next spring attack would be in full go again so that is not permanent. What is though is the flood of U.S. equipment to aid Soviet's and the eventual D-Day and Palermo landings which fully split Germany's efforts into hard fights on 3 fronts breaking their back. Without U.S. intervention Russia falls to an ever technologically advancing German military. In the future during the cold war U.S. moves to block aggressive Soviet control and big brother influence in other nations to stop what was thought to be world domination/control ideas. By pushing them to spend as much as a capitalist economy can spend on arms race they broke their own economy with poor spending and fell. Thus removing most of any overt oppressive control on other nations i.e. the "Iron Curtain" states. In the end the U.S. has done alot to help the world despite some failures and bad go's at it. So has other nations too. Anyone who wants America to fully mind it's own business and turn blind eye to world issues, and not get involed in other people's dealings I have this to say. Think hard and realistically what the situations the nations of the world would be like if the U.S. pulled up stakes from bases round the world, went back to pre-WWI isolationism policies, and minded our own boarders with 2 oceans to keep us separate. See then what comes with no serious help abound cause the U.N. sure's hell isn't saving anyone with out us.
Comment on Another Free Country Courtesy of USA (2009-04-19 00:13:38)
Continued... Second lets get some history shit outa the way here. I love history and study it with a passion and not being perfect, I know more than enough to stand on well founded knowledge. To be short as I can and be close to point I will generalize to a degree. 1.)The citizens of the 13 colonies were the first group of people to fully embrace the idea's of John Locke and Voltaire in the ideology of Nationalism and throw off the reigns of monarchy in independence. Yes French aid was crucial but given if only to see their rival, England, weaker and earn better trade for N.American goods. Also do not forget the brave peasant equivalent militia that made up most of the 13 colonies forces and had to stand against well trained regulars despite the French. Also it was from the inspiration of our defiance to England and hard won freedom that the citizens of France took their cue and socially revolted against the corrupt nobility to win their own free rights of self and government within 6 years. Treaty of Paris ending Revolutionary war 1783 - Fall of the Bastille, July 14th 1789.
Comment on Another Free Country Courtesy of USA (2009-04-18 23:38:51)
@Anyone who cares..or not..whatever: Whoa this is gonna be a long one since I have alot I want to address. If I'm wrong call me on it and I'll learn from it. But if your going to Bust my nutts you better do it with solid thought and facts not stirred emotion. First, lets be real and objective about this. This is a list of those nations who have been aided or been saved from great duress by MAJOR, PAST, U.S. involvement. It's purpose it to smack in the face those who categorically denounce the USA's involvement in the world and the positive side of the shit storms we have a hand in. Does our policies shake shit up and have some dirty sides to them. Answer-Very much Yes. So does every political body on the planet regardless of nation or style of leadership and everyone has their own agenda. Before governments it was kings, nobles, and emperors the world over, its HUMAN politics. @Dub_1211: What nation on earth doesn't look out for what it's controlling members feel is in it's best interest? If U.S. is so self minded do you think we would have so many fucked and re-cockulas problems to list here, within our own boarders?
Comment on Another Free Country Courtesy of USA (2009-04-18 00:29:16)
No like it or not this is a list of Countries that are free to choose their own lifestyle and self-government thanks to the efforts of USA. Starting from our involvement in world conflict with WWI till now. Western Europe, Africa and Russia from WW2. Russian Controlled USSR states from end of Cold War. Etc. That is not to say our government still doesn't mess things up with over involvement after the fact.
Comment on Vikings (2009-04-11 11:54:52)
ugh forgot to put "where" between is - the. Commence to killing me now.
Comment on Vikings (2009-04-11 11:53:21)
@sticky: Actually Norway is the real Viking plants are since that is where the majority of them came from. It is also where the most fjords which their name comes from kings of the "Vik" or fjords that were their homes. I've done a lil research cause my ancestry is Irish/Scotch/Norwegian. Last name is Anders. Just saying :)