PanikAttac (2712) 0 SFW Posts | 18 Space Comments | Favorites | RSS Feed Registered 2008-03-11 09:41:47 Comment Karma: 1 Featured Comments: 0 Member of :

Recent Comments from PanikAttac

Comment on Obama Carnival Game (2010-09-19 14:09:21)
WTF is wrong with people?!?
Comment on KaBOOM (2010-05-28 14:38:02)
I think it might be a MOAB test.
Comment on Cadillac: The Standard of the World (2009-02-17 16:10:05)
As a proud American I have to say: Standard for what? Junk?? Buy a Mercedes.
Comment on David Vs Goliath (2008-11-18 02:09:08)
The best part about this is that he has a Jew-Fro... adds an authenticity to the shot.
Comment on Super Dish (2008-08-17 20:22:14)
Nothing gets my motor going like the hyperbolic sub-reflector on a cassegrainian feed antenna. *NOM*!!
Comment on Sapporo (2008-08-04 12:30:07)
I just got back to the US after spending two years living in Japan and IMHO Japanese beer is crap. But that's coming from someone who doesn't like beer dry enough to shrivel your tongue like a snail under 50 pounds of rock salt. If that's your thing, then Japanese beer is for you!
Comment on venture brothers cast (2008-07-14 02:08:33)
"Great show", or (in the style of Dr. Orpheus) "The Greatest Show In The UNIVERSE, AND REALMS BEYOND!!"
Comment on awesome aircraft (2008-06-30 19:54:13)
Son-of-a... it does fly! That's what I get for paying attention in school.
Comment on awesome aircraft (2008-06-30 08:57:29)
@ Luke This craft actually demonstrates perfectly why jet (or jet turbine) engines are so complicated. The air entering the front of the nacelle has to exit with greater thrust than it entered with to compel the craft to flight. As counter-intuitive as it may seem, a closed body design (think single engine Cessna) will generate more lift because of the air flow over the lifting surfaces which is generated by the propeller. This closed body design will rely solely on the thrust derived from the encapsulated propeller to generate enough forward speed for lifting force to be applied to the wings. As the speed of the craft increases, a vacuum will form at the rear of the nacelle. The thrust generated will never exceed the force of the vacuum created at the rear of the thrust nozzle without being forced to exceed the sped of sound. A standard propeller can’t do that, it takes a turbo fan with a significant power source (a jet engine) or after-burners. Forward speed and lifting forces will never be great enough to achieve flight with this design. I wouldn’t be surprised if this is a pic of a mock-up at an engineering school built specifically to demonstrate these and other principles. God oh god, please don’t let this become the new air plane on a treadmill debate.
Comment on awesome aircraft (2008-06-30 03:06:00)
Obligatory: Will it take off? no.
Comment on My MCS Ad/Tribute to Tiki (2008-06-06 20:21:26)
This banner is full of win and awesome, it gets my vote.
Comment on In japan, toilet piss on you (2008-05-25 18:54:36)
I live in Japan and I can tell you; these things kick ass! Not only is the water heated, but the seat itself is heated as well. It's an odd experience the first time, but once you have tried one there is just no going back.
Comment on Tank Vs Rock (2008-04-15 00:37:38)
"Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness", I know why those ideals were put into the same sentence. Their fragile fate intertwines to form the foundation of something stronger. Spirit I think. Hunger too, that they might each fulfill one another. Without one, they independently starve and drive men mad, suffocating all attempts to exist independently until wild men violently rise up and lay claim to their missing endowment. This is how phrases like "Death first!" and "...but one life to give..." find their way to the lips of men.
Comment on Hardcore (2008-04-14 23:14:40)
What was he thinking? Anyone up for arousing game of Guitar Hero? a rousing game I mean a rousing gun *penis* NO!!!! DAMN YOU FREUD!!!
Comment on How the moon landing was faked (2008-03-29 01:24:14)
I seriously doubt there are any telescopes on earth that can resolve anything as small as the largest object humans have placed on the moon. Hubble doesn't even have that kind of resolution. http://hubble.nasa.gov/overview/faq.php#moon