http://blog.heartland.org/2011/03/we-snobs-would-be-happy-to-pay-for-npr/ :-D
Noah Bawdy (172102)
1 SFW Posts |
15 Space Comments
| Favorites | RSS Feed
All your talk is cheap skywriting. Registered 2011-03-06 04:39:10 Comment Karma: -3 Featured Comments: 0 Member of : |
Recent Comments from Noah Bawdy
- Comment on why save pbs (2011-04-02 02:40:25)
http://blog.heartland.org/2011/03/we-snobs-would-be-happy-to-pay-for-npr/ :-D - Comment on why save pbs (2011-04-01 03:28:58)
;-P - Comment on why save pbs (2011-04-01 03:28:37)
Public Schools have been declining for decades. Every year we pour more money into them and they continue to worsen. Privatization of schools is a topic for another thread. - Comment on why save pbs (2011-04-01 03:25:34)
Broadcasting TV shows and radio programs are no where near the other things you have cited. They simply are not vital. They are frivolous and a luxury we can no longer afford. Your "arguments" are moot. They will be defunded. They will survive or they won't. I for one will not miss either of them if they don’t. - Comment on why save pbs (2011-04-01 03:11:56)
They will be defunded and they will survive or not. I for one will not miss either of them if they don't. - Comment on why save pbs (2011-04-01 03:08:40)
You are willfully ignoring what their own executives admitted. They don’t need Federal funding. It doesn't matter what kind of pretzel logic you throw at this issue, they will be defunded. People like you will still be free to voluntarily throw money at them all you want without forcing me to. - Comment on why save pbs (2011-04-01 03:03:20)
That is Exactly the point. PBS/NPR take our tax dollars, what you euphemistically call public money. Hundreds of television and radio networks thrive without tax payer money. Their own executives admitted that they don’t need Federal funding. They have a cult following that will always be willing to shell out money to them voluntarily. There is simply no need for them to take money from those of us that don’t consume their product. - Comment on why save pbs (2011-04-01 02:56:46)
My point is they don't need my money. They will survive just fine without it. All of your blathering about other things the government spends money on ignores this distinction. - Comment on why save pbs (2011-04-01 02:53:33)
Private schools don't take our tax dollars. Try to have some rational argument. Oh that's right. You're an idiot. Never mind. - Comment on why save pbs (2011-04-01 02:44:34)
Their own executives admitted that they don't need Federal funding. They have a cult following that will always be willing to shell out money to them voluntarily. There is simply no need for them to take money from those of us that don't consume their product. - Comment on why save pbs (2011-04-01 02:36:36)
It's not arbitrary at all. They can survive just fine without our tax dollars. - Comment on why save pbs (2011-04-01 02:26:44)
We ALL pay, whether we want to or not. - Comment on why save pbs (2011-04-01 02:22:25)
sambo78, You have an ID Ten T problem there. PBS and NPR are media. It seems there are a lot of media out there surviving very well on their own without stealing from me. Except for Airhead America. Funny how that worked out. I'm betting you were a fan. - Comment on why save pbs (2011-04-01 00:44:31)
If PBS and NPR have such valuable products, they will survive without stealing my hard earned money. - Comment on Wild Kingdom - needs quote! (2011-03-06 00:42:33)
Bad breath IS a Super power !