Anonymous (78) 72 SFW Posts | 605 Space Comments | Favorites | RSS Feed Registered 2006-12-08 15:00:00 Comment Karma: 16 Featured Comments: 0 Member of :

Recent Comments from Anonymous

Comment on Rachel Bilson - Pink Shorts (2009-01-27 16:14:22)
@dieAntagonista: I don't think people talk about me... I just think people that use the internet think that they are Anonymous, when they really aren't. I am.
Comment on Rachel Bilson - Pink Shorts (2009-01-27 16:13:07)
Which dieAntagonista has the Bizzaro goatee? I'd bet $$ that one's the fake.
Comment on centaur (2009-01-27 15:11:19)
@chupathingy: It looks kind of fake with him just standing there, too.
Comment on Enterprise NX01 Breaking Orbit (2009-01-27 14:45:56)
It's just going so fast, the light reflecting off of the Enterprise surface hasn't reached the camera yet. I don't really know. I'm just making shit up.
Comment on Pineapple Express - Police Riders (2009-01-27 14:43:29)
@MacheteJak: Yeah... especially where people really weren't all that good at it.
Comment on Coffee Pot Vs Coffee Mug (2009-01-27 11:37:20)
@natedog: And I bet you don't have coffee mugs and pots doing dirty things on your counter... or do you?
Comment on obama in in action figure form (2009-01-27 11:06:27)
@mAgnUS BUTTfoorson: He's already making a difference: Abortions for some, American Flags for others!
Comment on Coffee Pot Vs Coffee Mug (2009-01-27 11:02:40)
Rule #34? Would that be a "Coffee-Shower"?
Comment on Rachel Bilson - Pink Shorts (2009-01-27 11:01:08)
@dieAntagonista: I know... I get my UID stolen all the time.
Comment on centaur (2009-01-27 10:57:48)
@chupathingy: I bet he gets them all from behind, with his centaur-cock.
Comment on Maltron Keyboard (2009-01-27 09:32:45)
@Shanghai_Factor: So, it probably took you about 16 seconds to type that, eh? @ColombianMonkey: Yeah... this would be really useful to those that jerk to web-cam chat shit.
Comment on Maltron Keyboard (2009-01-26 23:17:53)
Supposedly, after doing the training program, people can type up to 85 words/minute one-handed on these things.
Comment on if you want to protect marriage attack divorce (2009-01-26 15:16:15)
Also... lulz at fuckin' bigots who have spray paint on car and driveway. Idiots.
Comment on if you want to protect marriage attack divorce (2009-01-26 15:15:28)
From an oped in the Washington Post: C.S. Lewis, the British essayist, author and cleric, died 41 years ago, so he wasn't writing about same-sex marriage in America. No, his subject in his book "Mere Christianity" was divorce. Still, his observations might shed some light on our own "values" controversy today. "I should like to distinguish two things which are very often confused," he wrote. "The Christian conception of marriage is one: the other is the quite different question - how far Christians, if they are voters or Members of Parliament, ought to try to force their views of marriage on the rest of the community by embodying them in the divorce laws. "There ought to be two distinct kinds of marriage: one governed by the State with rules enforced on all citizens, the other governed by the Church with rules enforced by her on her own members. The distinction ought to be quite sharp, so that a man knows which couples are married in a Christian sense and which are not." Religious marriage, he was saying, is a sacrament, and the state has no more business involving itself in the rules that govern it than it has in such questions as the efficacy of infant baptism, the validity of kosher certification or the number of virgins a (male) martyr might reasonably anticipate as his reward. But marriage isn't only sacrament. It is also the basis on which we decide who may inherit in the absence of a will, who may make life-and-death decisions for loved ones, or who is eligible for the advantages of joint tax returns. And because it has these secular implications, the state has a legitimate role in determining who is married and who isn't. The church has no interest in joint filings, and the state no interest in declarations of love or religious affiliation. To the one, marriage is a sacred rite; to the other, it is the sanctioning of a contractual relationship. The church may care whether he is a philanderer or she a gold-digger, or whether there's too great a gap in their ages. The state's interests run to the validity of the contract.
Comment on Diamon Lips (2009-01-26 09:07:39)
(clack)(clack)(clack)