I think the irony is that it's illegal in California to use the name of any restaurant, retailer, etc in an ad for an alcoholic beverage. That truck is basically a rolling ad for Bacardi that has the distribution company's name on the side too. Just imagine that the cop is ticketing the truck driver for that.
M-3 (297)
26 SFW Posts |
148 Space Comments
| Favorites | RSS Feed
Registered 2007-04-30 13:05:32 Comment Karma: 15 Featured Comments: 0 Member of : |
Recent Comments from M-3
- Comment on Irony? (2007-09-09 11:40:00)
I think the irony is that it's illegal in California to use the name of any restaurant, retailer, etc in an ad for an alcoholic beverage. That truck is basically a rolling ad for Bacardi that has the distribution company's name on the side too. Just imagine that the cop is ticketing the truck driver for that. - Comment on They've already won (2007-09-09 08:41:02)
True. They're both fun back n' forths to watch. We could always combine the two and talk about how religion hasn't put out an upgrade in centuries and politics keeps crashing because its kernel is corrupted. - Comment on Official Epic Fail Seal (2007-09-09 06:48:35)
I think it's obvious that we know what we're doing as a nation. We always have. Watch this and you'll see: http://www.newscloud.com/read/America_to_the_Rescue_The_Daily_Show - Comment on They've already won (2007-09-08 09:04:47)
Religion of any kind is a man made prison designed to control and exploit people and limit their freedom. Christians might let you practice another religion (as long as their God is mentioned on our money and in the Pledge of Allegiance), drink (except for when they passed prohibition), let women have a voice (but only after 1920 - not even 100 years yet - and still not allowed by the church to have an abortion), but really what is the difference? Every religion wants you to believe in an invisible man that will destroy you if you don't love him and give him your money. The only thing going to hell is organized religion and the people that lead and follow it. - Comment on They've already won (2007-09-08 08:12:28)
Funny how when you have a country run by fascist religious fanatics who like to blow sh*t up to further their political agenda they're immediately labeled as terrorists... unless the country is ours. Let's hear it for fundamentalist Christian America! - Comment on Someday I have to visit here (2007-08-30 15:18:48)
I painted this once from a much better photo. I'm almost positive that it's in Hawaii. - Comment on Apple - Crash Different (2007-08-24 10:39:26)
My advice to the poor guy who's Mac was crashing would be to uninstall NAV altogether. Why waste the money and system resources to protect against the one known OSX virus that's already been patched? Speaking of crashes, this is an oldie but a goodie: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KeSh822S1f4 - Comment on PC Versus Mac (Game Edition) (2007-08-12 16:44:18)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QT6YO30GhmQ - Comment on PC Versus Mac (Game Edition) (2007-08-12 16:43:08)
Actually many graphics cards are available on the Mac first but then you'd have to follow both to know that. - Comment on PC Versus Mac (Game Edition) (2007-08-12 16:39:04)
Alec, there can never be an argument that MS has the market. Nobody's debating that. And naturally, people will write viruses for whichever OS has the highest share. The question is why can't the "talented braintrust" of the richest corporation in the world write code that isn't bloated, has security holes in it, and rips off OSX's interface and features? If they're so smart why didn't Windows 2000 have these features before OSX and not five years after? Talent? - Comment on PC Versus Mac (Game Edition) (2007-08-12 16:33:53)
Sorry, Alec. You can't call bullshit on a link until after you read the article: "Notes: Mac Pro uses four 512MB DIMMs for increased performance; Dell uses 2 1GB DIMMs. Dell is also available in “750W†configuration for $470 less; this system apparently doesn’t provide enough power to graphics cards to support more than two monitors. Mac Pro’s PCI slots can be configured in four combinations of speeds. Dell LCD display is “free†as part of a current promotion. Dell’s specs for the 690 note 4 DIMM slots for a maximum of 8GB RAM, but other documentation mentions available expansion to 16 DIMM slots for a total of 64GB RAM; Dell’s specs also conflict on hard drive and optical drive bays." They had to put a card in that can support more than two high definition monitors of at least 30" like the "budget level", as you called it, card in the Mac. And the Dell display, as noted in the notes, is 'free' with the computer so the Apple wasn't configured with a monitor in order to keep it fair, ie. only list what the customer actually ordered. Oh and Matt Damon! to yo, casemods! ^_^ - Comment on PC Versus Mac (Game Edition) (2007-08-12 14:28:41)
The pricing between the two are comparable with the Mac actually showing more value for the dollar in recent times. http://www.macworld.com/2006/08/features/macproprice/index.php A PC can run Windows and Linux but not OSX. A Mac can run all three and thus can run all the PC games at native speed for when you feel like dicking off instead of making money. Macs come bundled with iLife which has won countless awards and are incredible apps considering they're free. PC's come bundled with AOL and ads for a million anti-virus apps that you have to buy. Windows viruses: 50,000+ Mac viruses: 1 People who I know that have converted from Windows to Mac: at least 30 (including me) People who went the other way: 0 Oh and I have a 10 year old beige G3 at home running OSX as a file server that has never been upgraded or repaired since it was purchased. Anyone out there have a 10 year old Dell that can run Vista or even run at all? Didn't think so. - Comment on New York's Future (2007-08-11 17:40:57)
I still say "boo"! Both designs are too sterile and are trying too hard. I mean really, are those buildings going to fit with the rest of the skyline? No. And if you're thinking "Well, that's the point", then you know why I say they're trying too hard. You can't put super-sleek, sexy, futuristic skyscrapers in NYC; it detracts from the old world class and history of the rest of the buildings and the city in general. I still say the best tribute to the people who loved those towers and worked in them every day, not to mention an ultimate symbol of defiance against those that destroyed them, would be to rebuild the twin towers exactly as they were. - Comment on Penquin = Whale Snack (2007-07-31 18:28:43)
So anyway, why have I seen so many re-posts lately yet exactly one of the half dozen pics that I've uploaded in the last week made it on? Anyone else experiencing this? - Comment on Epic Failure (2007-07-28 21:04:41)
You're doing it wrong!