ArtDecoDalek (203)
29 SFW Posts | 16 Space Comments | Favorites | RSS Feed



Registered 2007-04-10 21:09:12

Comment Karma: 2
Featured Comments: 0
Member of :

Recent Comments from ArtDecoDalek

  • Comment on Windows for solitaire? (2007-09-15 01:49:25)
    Macintosh for Productivity Macintosh for Development Macintosh for Mobility Windows for Buffer Overflows
  • Comment on Capitol Hill Is Closed (2007-09-14 05:16:51)
    Wow, that is soooo clever. You really zinged him because, you know, he's, like, black, and stuff.
  • Comment on PC Versus Mac (Person Edition) (2007-09-06 18:33:04)
    AlecDalek, that is an astounding level of cluelessness, even by Internet standards. Maybe you should apply at Microsoft, I think they're looking for some stellar brains for their new "iPhone Killer" project.
  • Comment on PC Versus Mac (Person Edition) (2007-09-06 18:16:34)
    eric, if you get into heavy JavaScript and AJAX, you will really need to test it on a Mac and Linux box, as there are some quirks depending on the platform. If you're just doing HTML/CSS/PHP type stuff, it should be fine on those platforms in Safari/Camino/Firefox.
  • Comment on PC Versus Mac (Person Edition) (2007-09-06 17:35:03)
    egnilk66 on September 6th, 2007 4:13 pm: "I still run a Commodore 64!!! Emulate that on your Mac, BITCHES!!!" http://www.cafebaron.com/emulators/Power64-OSX.dmg
  • Comment on PC Versus Mac (Person Edition) (2007-09-06 17:32:56)
    eric, there are several native browsers. The browser made by Apple and included with Mac OS X is Safari, and is one of the few browsers on the market than can pass the Acid2 browser test (IE doesn't come close to passing. Firefox v3 passes, but it's still in alpha). I mostly use Camino, which is a freeware native Mac implementation of the Mozilla engine, which is what Firefox uses. There's also a semi-native, ported version of Firefox, which is okay, but has a few problems. Other good native browsers include OmniView, Opera, and others, but those cost money. Pretty much every one I've tried sucks a lot less than IE. I do web development, and IE is always the one that I have to do a lot of extra stuff for to make it work. Mostly I target things for Firefox, and it'll work on most browsers, and then I fuck up my code until it works on IE.
  • Comment on PC Versus Mac (Person Edition) (2007-09-06 17:20:31)
    Pretty sure Hodgman is wearing frilly lace panties under the cheap suit.
  • Comment on Microsoft (2007-08-12 22:58:40)
    Yes, a gun is always a good way to win an argument, when you cannot win it on merit.
  • Comment on PC Versus Mac (Game Edition) (2007-08-12 13:54:37)
    Apple computers, quite simply, are not more expensive than other brands. Similarly configured, they are, in fact, less expensive. The people that say otherwise are ill-informed and simply repeat what they've been told. In any case, even if they were more expensive, they are superior products, so why would they not cost more? Most people that deride Apple computers and the Mac OS have not actually used either, so they can simply be dismissed as ignorant. I see no actual informed points being made here against Macs. Perhaps some of the posters could bother educating themselves, or perhaps they could just shut the fuck up.
  • Comment on Global Warming World Map (2007-06-01 19:16:41)
    I find it highly amusing that the Jeros entity believes he/she/it has refuted decades of peer-reviewed climatological science with a glass of water and some ice cubes. Maybe she/he/it will use a dinner plate and some bacon to show us how pigs are actually the most intelligent species living on our flat earth. Just think of the damage to mainstream science sheheit could do with a salt shaker!
  • Comment on Unfinished Building (2007-04-29 19:19:32)
    Just don't stand under it.
  • Comment on Beautiful Clinton (2007-04-29 19:18:16)
    Judging by her expression, she must be listening to Michele Bachmann talk about creationism.
  • Comment on Foundation For Biomedical Research Advertisement (2007-04-23 14:03:19)
    "Insulin binding parameters have been measured in testicular membranes of streptozotocin diabetic male rats. Insulin binding decrease was ascribed to the well-known depressing effect of diabetes mellitus on circulating luteinizing hormone (LH). Because both LH and insulin receptors are modulated by pituitary LH and because of their reduction in testes of diabetic rats, we conclude that Leydig cell dysfunction is a secondary disorder associated with this complex metabolic condition. PMID: 3909853 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]"
  • Comment on Where Was Bush? (2007-04-21 22:44:22)
    One day, Bodero will see the light. But, it's a long crawl out of Bush's colon.
  • Comment on Wall Climbers (2007-04-10 17:13:08)
    Oh my god!!! They turned the camera SIDEWAYS!!! When will the insanity end?!!!
| Next page