Revolvers - Elegant weapon for a more civilized age

Revolvers – Elegant weapon for a more civilized age

Added on January 20th, 2009 by fiabm | Report Post
Tags:Humor, Motivational Posters, Weapons

15 Comments

Inline Feedbacks

View all comments

Seth_Dracovitch (#2881)

15 years ago

I was hoping for something funny or witty… but no… no. You want elegance? Use a minigun…

Puulaahi (#4552)

15 years ago

At least use a Dirty Harry quote, goddamn.

Harry Callahan: I know what you’re thinking. “Did he fire six shots or only five?” Well, to tell you the truth, in all this excitement I kind of lost track myself. But being as this is a .44 Magnum, the most powerful handgun in the world, and would blow your head clean off, you’ve got to ask yourself one question: Do I feel lucky? Well, do ya, punk?

Ukwarlock (#3827)

15 years ago

Soap – “Guns for Show, Knives for a Pro.”

Leon – “The Rifle is the first weapon you will learn how to use. Because it lest you keep your disntace from the Client; the closer you get to being a pro, the closer you can get to the client.”

drainbow (#4295)

15 years ago

I was thinking “Revolvers. There is no way in Hell they can fit this many bullets in at once.”

dieAntagonista (#)

15 years ago

@...Puulaahi: I have memorised those lines so well it’s embarrassing. Harry FTFW.

-1

Shanghai_Factor (#473)

15 years ago

Since when are semi-automatics “clumsy” and “random?” What kind of semi-auto’s has this guy been shooting?

Gary Generic (#1448)

15 years ago

Sounds like Roland of Gilead is a bit of a Star Wars fan.

Nimbo (#2449)

15 years ago

Automatics are boring, as in boringly reliable compared to a revolver. Most flavors of revolvers have a silly number of moving parts. Now dont be trying to say a Kel Tec or other piece of crap is going to be as reliable as saw a S&W 627, Kel Tec is garbage, and the performance shop puts outs some decent kit.

Revolvers do have a certain panache to them that an a automatic just cant touch however.

Drewlicious (#1703)

15 years ago

No. no no no no no n on onon onn nonononoonnonono!

This is just wrong!

Puulaahi (#4552)

15 years ago

@...dieAntagonista: Embarrassing? Never. Clint Eastwood is God.

HoChunk (#5604)

15 years ago

@...Gary Scenario: Thank you –NOW I get it. Made no sense otherwise.

marcuserektus (#4312)

15 years ago

See motivation poster under “Basic Math”

-1

SumoSnipe (#4452)

15 years ago

@...Nimbo: um, my revolver has 4 moving parts, and 3 springs. no jams, no missfire. My brothers Colt 1911, spends more time in the shop,(firing pin) and is only good for about 30 rounds at the range before gumming up and refusing to feed.