-
My[Confined]Space
Better Than Bread
Movies Coming Soon- Star Trek Books
- “Star Trek: Lower Decks – Warp Your Own Way” Review by Akotsko.substack.com
- Happy 2024 Birthday to Christie Golden!
- “Star Trek: Voyager: 16 Seven Of Nine” Review by Deepspacespines.com
- Nana Visitor Joins Us to Talk About Her New Book – Star Trek: Open a Channel: A Woman’s Trek!
- Out Today: “Star Trek #26”
- Star Trek Strange New Worlds Asylum Book Review
- John Jackson Miller Books Ranked!
- “Star Trek: The Next Generation: Headlong Flight” Review by Lessaccurategrandmother.blogspot.com
- Jumping into Adventure with “Into the Void”
- Happy 2024 Birthday to Jim Johnson!
- Movie Related Products
- “Deadpool & Wolverine” Review
- Kevin Smith Is Getting Closer and Closer to Dogma 2
- “The Garfield Movie” Review
- Disney Said to be Considering a Surprising Replacement for Bob Iger: EA CEO Andrew Wilson – IGN
- Amazon Is Shutting Down Freevee, Its Ad-Supported Video Streamer
- “Breathe” Review
- “Transformers One” Review
- Captain America: Brave New World | Official Trailer
- Marvel Studios’ Thunderbolts* | D23 Brazil Special Look | In Theaters May 2, 2025
- Mattel apologizes after mistakenly printing porn site on ‘Wicked’ movie dolls packaging | CNN Business
- Music Video DB
Gub’mnt – stopping stupid people from doing stupid things since 1776 (amongst other things).
As Krugman says, there are no libertarians in a financial crisis 😛
So?
Don’t you already regard the US government as tyrants?
“Have you bought fireworks in the last 10 years?” “Well, ye-” “TERRORIST”
@...Bicoid:
what if there are stupid people IN the government
how does the Government stop itself?
maybe they cant, look at bush, no-one stopped him, he lasted the full term of office
It is not UNCONSTITUTIONAL. The constitution is the framing legal document of any one county, it’s birth certificate if you will. Something can be UNCONSTITUTIONAL only if it directly contradicts what is written in the constitution.Founding father’s statements are not in the constitution. Hence there is no unconstitutionality.
Why yes, I am a law nazi.
anything thomas jefferson disagrees with is unconstitutional.
Thomas Jefferson is my homeboy.
@...KommissarKvC:
You mean like Hitler? Stupid people elect stupid people. There are only two exceptions, when they’re desperate or when they have been deceived.
@...KommissarKvC:
Also, you must be the most irrational individual I have ever come across. How come you dare to question any government? Are you a pseudo anarchist as well or what. You do understand that your dream of fascism, and the killing of minorities can never get fulfilled without a government and maybe a nice psychopath dictator?
If you purchase one of these at a pawn shop etc you can’t be persecuted, if you were a soldier/law enforcement official selling them you’d have reason to fear this engraving… so please take a pill and be chill, they should have included Bosnians & Ugandans with the list though.
If we’re going to use literal interpretations of 200+ year old wisdom…
Nuclear Arms for everybody! 😀
It’s on A gun…not all guns…just THAT gun…I assume THAT gun BELONGS to the gov’t…And…it doesn’t say US anywhere on it, that I can see.
Your point seems flimsy – like you just want to pick a fight and bitch about guns.
If we ever had to put the government in check like the founding fathers had ot in 1776 I would hate to put my semi auto guns against their fully automatic weapons. I am just saying. How is a nations people supposed to gaurd themselves against a well armed military force without comparable weaponry.
Thats what the Brit’s said in 1776
@...flood123: Right on, man. I’m also tired of those bastards lording over us with their jet aircraft and their heavily armored tanks! We’ll never be safe until we’ve got F-22s and Abrams tanks in our backyards, too.
@...flood123: That, hippies be damned, is the intent of the second ammendment.
Also, if you notice, the engraving is not on a gun. It is the magazine and it’s capacity that was banned under the assault weapons ban. Dems want to reinstitute that ban, and go a step further by banning all firearms with a detatchable magazine. I for one believe we will soon see an enormous tax placed on ammunition. They may not, legally, be able to ban weapons, but they can make them un-affordable.
@...Kishi:
“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”
When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.-Thomas Jefferson-
“Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both.-Benjamin Franklin-
The ammendment, and the people who wrote it. It kinda speaks for itself. Doesn’t it?
Kishi-
hahaa thats funny. I guess we wil never be as well armed as our governments military. A tank and a Fighter jet would be fun though. Can I just pick those up at the local gun shop hahaha. Millions of dollars later I would most like crash them due to pilot error. Probably not such a good idea. I will stick ot what i know how to handle I suppose.
the3g_iwp-
Ammo is already expensive. As soon as they tax it more I will make my own reloads.
@...flood123: Wow, you are a fucking retard. You know what, don’t get a gun, you’d probably hurt yourself or someone else. Do you REALLY think that anytime in history that the common man had access to advanced weaponry? And what do you think a disadvantaged side does? Resort to unconventional warfare, like fighting out of formation (US revolutionary war), using tunnels/booby-traps/civilians (Vietnam War), IEDs (Iraq, Ireland).`
Tony-
I was being facetious. I know we can’t get our hands on advanced weaponry. I dont actually think I can go and pick up heavy weaponry at a gun store or anywhere else fror that matter. To assume that is what I meant is kinda funny and downright ludicrous. I am sorry if misunderstood. I am not here to argue. Furthermore you are correct. Unconventional warfare is the key.
As far as the “fucking retarded” comment I will just leave that one alone as I am not one for internet arguments.
City commission of Washington, D.C. lost the ban on firearms, so now trying to regulate and legislate them out of existence…
@...flood123: My bad, I had a crap day at work and didn’t get around to beating the wife and kid yet.
HAHAHA It’s cool man. We are all good. I got a heavy bag for the same problem. Hope your day gets better.
@...flood123: Calling his wife a heavy bag was simply uncalled for mister.
@...the3g_ipwn: At least flood123 got my point.
I am highy trainable. Just like any of the higher apes.
B/c those mags are in succcchhhh high demand jamming p.o.s.
@...dieAntagonista:
oh yeah, ranting about hitler AGAIN, boo hoo, jews died, who cares
Bush would have gone on for his own genocide of middle eastern people if he had spent longer in office, but he did manage to mave whatm almost 100,000 killed in his 3 years
Yet another poor strawman argument.
one example:
taking hard earned money from the people who earned it.
Ok to gripe you have to understand what that image is. It is not banning a weapon of any sort.
The picture is of a 30 round magazine for the M16 series and M4 carbine series rifles, and the M249 Light Machine gun (emergency reserve use only.)
It is only banning the use of that magazine. More specifically under law. Those magazines that were produced after Sept. ’94 (only because those that were already privately owned were grandfathered in)
Unless you are planning on getting into one major firefight, the standard 20round mag is more than sufficient and perfectly legal to own.
Thomas Jefferson also codified racism.
From Notes on the State of Virginia:
Comparing them by their faculties of memory, reason, and imagination, it appears to me, that in memory they are equal to the whites; in reason much inferior, as I think one could scarcely be found capable of tracing and comprehending the investigations of Euclid; and that in imagination they are dull, tasteless, and anomalous. Etc etc etc