As far as I know only one advocates beheading anyone who disagree, advocates rape as a punishment, practices stoning for adultery, and idolizes a pedophile.
And when when Phil talks about killing them, he means going to war with them, which is sensible since they’re already at war with us.
skndrbg (#191104)
10 years ago
On the left a murderous barbarian, a veritable prince among his retrograde co-religionists, an enemy of civilization and a complete suppurating hemorrhoidal asshole who is currently and deservedly in death as he was in life as low or lower than whaleshit.
On the right a man with personal views with no stated intent to force them in anyway on anyone else.
Above them, the name of a poster who is losing very badly at the apparently challenging game of choosing between “own ass and hole in the ground”.
Thought this was about all the fake grievance background noise about his views on homosexuality. I hadn’t heard that Phil had embraced an eye for an eye. Still … quite a stretch to imagine equivalence. It is a long way from talk to actual deed.
I don’t imagine many on the planet go to sleep fearful of Christians. But even many moslems go to sleep fearful of moslems.
The question should be who has killed more Muslims in the Middle East, Muslims terrorists or US military defending Muslims? The US is a distant second. You have one side beheading men, women and children, raping entire towns, not figuratively, literally raping every woman and a good portion of the men and children in towns they conquer. And you have the US who have killed numerous civilians, especially under Obama, but at the same time the US is not purposely targeting civilians. No comparison between 8th century barbarians and the 21st century civilized soldiers defending against them.
Because the US military is there to protect Muslims. It’s a nice lie, and it might even be a byproduct of US military presence, but let’s not be gullible.
It’s true that the mindset of lots of people over in the middle east is comparable to the people you’d find in the old testament of the bible. But is the US blameless for the unrest in the middle east? Not in the least. Does some of this stem from religious ideas? Christian *and* Muslim? You bet.
It’s great that USA isn’t sending rape squads to third world countries, although that’s setting the bar rather low. We expect more from USA, more so in the past than now, perhaps.
Obongo has been office for 6 years and we’re still have troops in the Middle East and Guantanimo is still open and the US Government now spies on it’s own people.
So if I had a time machine and I went back to when you were a blastocyst and killed you, it wouldn’t be murder? Funny how everyone in favor of abortion have already been born.
I get it, some people don’t want to be grown-ups and accept the adult responsibility of having children, so they have to invent a new age double speak to get around the touch subject of baby murder.
thestone: “So if I had a time machine and I went back to when you were a blastocyst and killed you”
This is how you spot a bad argument: when someone has to break out a TIME MACHINE to have it make even the least bit of sense (if that).
What if that bird you accidentally ran over would later have crashed into the engine of an airplane carrying a dictator or Beyonce? You better make cars illegal!
So long as there is a known cause and effect, there is responsibility. Your argument would only make sense if random abortions for no specific reason were performed for reasons other than baby murder. The only reason to perform an abortion is to end a pregnancy. It’s not done to fight acne or to feng shui the uterus.
“So long as there is a known cause and effect, there is responsibility.”
Yep, every fertile woman that isn’t trying to get pregnant with EVERY ovulation is knowingly stopping the existence of people that otherwise might have lived full and fruitful lives. Abstinence is murder.
That’s not what I said, Fink! He brought up abortion twice without anyone else mentioning it (which didn’t really bother me, I was just being facetious), I didn’t throw my two cents in until the thread was mostly about abortion. If I’d tried to force the topic onto say, gun control multiple times, THEN I’d be a hypocrite.
As far as I know only one advocates beheading anyone who disagree, advocates rape as a punishment, practices stoning for adultery, and idolizes a pedophile.
And when when Phil talks about killing them, he means going to war with them, which is sensible since they’re already at war with us.
On the left a murderous barbarian, a veritable prince among his retrograde co-religionists, an enemy of civilization and a complete suppurating hemorrhoidal asshole who is currently and deservedly in death as he was in life as low or lower than whaleshit.
On the right a man with personal views with no stated intent to force them in anyway on anyone else.
Above them, the name of a poster who is losing very badly at the apparently challenging game of choosing between “own ass and hole in the ground”.
Thought this was about all the fake grievance background noise about his views on homosexuality. I hadn’t heard that Phil had embraced an eye for an eye. Still … quite a stretch to imagine equivalence. It is a long way from talk to actual deed.
I don’t imagine many on the planet go to sleep fearful of Christians. But even many moslems go to sleep fearful of moslems.
“I don’t imagine many on the planet go to sleep fearful of Christians”
You’re serious, aren’t you? Ignorance doesn’t *support* an argument.
That shifty looking guy on the right must be responsible for the death of thousands.
Religion is the cause (or at least the excuse) for much of the suffering inflicted by humans on other humans.
Those two religions, have the same god, and some of the prophets, etc., so no surprise there.
Who has killed more people,
Muslim people in the US, or
Christian US in the middle east?
I’d rather choose none than either religion of peace.
And stop with the killing already, both of you.
Who has killed more people:
Muslim people in the US, or
Christian US in the middle east, or
Atheist people at Planed Parenthood in the US?
The answer is the Christian US in the middle east.
The question should be who has killed more Muslims in the Middle East, Muslims terrorists or US military defending Muslims? The US is a distant second. You have one side beheading men, women and children, raping entire towns, not figuratively, literally raping every woman and a good portion of the men and children in towns they conquer. And you have the US who have killed numerous civilians, especially under Obama, but at the same time the US is not purposely targeting civilians. No comparison between 8th century barbarians and the 21st century civilized soldiers defending against them.
Because the US military is there to protect Muslims. It’s a nice lie, and it might even be a byproduct of US military presence, but let’s not be gullible.
It’s true that the mindset of lots of people over in the middle east is comparable to the people you’d find in the old testament of the bible. But is the US blameless for the unrest in the middle east? Not in the least. Does some of this stem from religious ideas? Christian *and* Muslim? You bet.
It’s great that USA isn’t sending rape squads to third world countries, although that’s setting the bar rather low. We expect more from USA, more so in the past than now, perhaps.
Because Obama was the one to put two Middle East wars on a credit card. George W. Bush never existed.
Obongo has been office for 6 years and we’re still have troops in the Middle East and Guantanimo is still open and the US Government now spies on it’s own people.
The US has killed millions in the Middle East?
What, did they open up a Planned Parenthood “clinic”?
Millions of what? People? Clumps of cells?
Certainly millions of the latter.
A blastocyst isn’t a person, you inbred.
Actually it is.
Actually, it isn’t. Yet.
So if I had a time machine and I went back to when you were a blastocyst and killed you, it wouldn’t be murder? Funny how everyone in favor of abortion have already been born.
I get it, some people don’t want to be grown-ups and accept the adult responsibility of having children, so they have to invent a new age double speak to get around the touch subject of baby murder.
Apparently you REALLY wanted to have an argument about abortion, topic at hand be damned!
thestone: “So if I had a time machine and I went back to when you were a blastocyst and killed you”
This is how you spot a bad argument: when someone has to break out a TIME MACHINE to have it make even the least bit of sense (if that).
What if that bird you accidentally ran over would later have crashed into the engine of an airplane carrying a dictator or Beyonce? You better make cars illegal!
So long as there is a known cause and effect, there is responsibility. Your argument would only make sense if random abortions for no specific reason were performed for reasons other than baby murder. The only reason to perform an abortion is to end a pregnancy. It’s not done to fight acne or to feng shui the uterus.
“So long as there is a known cause and effect, there is responsibility.”
Yep, every fertile woman that isn’t trying to get pregnant with EVERY ovulation is knowingly stopping the existence of people that otherwise might have lived full and fruitful lives. Abstinence is murder.
A woman can’t make a child on her own. She has to have unprotected sex with a man.
I thought nurgen insisted we weren’t allowed to debate Abortion in this comment section. What a hypocrite.
That’s not what I said, Fink! He brought up abortion twice without anyone else mentioning it (which didn’t really bother me, I was just being facetious), I didn’t throw my two cents in until the thread was mostly about abortion. If I’d tried to force the topic onto say, gun control multiple times, THEN I’d be a hypocrite.
if you can’t see it, it’s a picture of a button that says “I AM A TERRORIST!”…
there’s no button.
here