To a scientist a lie is something presented as true that can be proven to be untrue, to a theologian a lie is something that is counter to their beliefs.
Scientific proof is irrelevant to a theologian. To them, evolution is indeed a lie.
anyone read below the evolution is a lie part? jesus was the king of israel? there was no israel when he supposedly lived, nor was he a king, and I thought the rapture was supposed to take all the christians to heaven. now there taking over the earth? wtf, why can’t religious people ever get there stories straight?
To a scientist a lie is something presented as true that can be proven to be untrue, to a theologian a lie is something that is counter to their beliefs.
Scientific proof is irrelevant to a theologian. To them, evolution is indeed a lie.
One of your descriptions presents logic.
The other presents delusion.
I wonder how many healthy sane people, when confronted with the choice between logic and delusion, would purposefully pick delusion…
to find out…first we need to find a sane person…
according to stats its’ about 80% of the US, picking delusion of course
Re: the return of Jesus…
The bibles “soon(tm)” puts Valve’s to shame.
anyone read below the evolution is a lie part? jesus was the king of israel? there was no israel when he supposedly lived, nor was he a king, and I thought the rapture was supposed to take all the christians to heaven. now there taking over the earth? wtf, why can’t religious people ever get there stories straight?