So, I guess the main difference between what they’re calling a “cinemagraph” (or is it “cinematagraph”? Too lazy to go look it up.) and just a “gif” is that you choose part of it to move, while the rest of it stays still, right? OK, fine, that works in some instances, but when there’s portions of the picture where it is clearly SUPPOSED to be in motion, in order to make sense with the portion that IS in motion, why choose that part to be still? It just doesn’t work, and makes it look st00pid, IMO. Clearly, the portions of this machine that we can see between yellow columns #1 and #2, as well as between columns #2 and #3 are supposed to be moving as well as the part that IS moving. Why choose to make it look st00pid?