-
My[Confined]Space
Better Than Bread
Movies Coming Soon- Star Trek Books
- Happy 2024 Birthday to Christie Golden!
- “Star Trek: Voyager: 16 Seven Of Nine” Review by Deepspacespines.com
- Nana Visitor Joins Us to Talk About Her New Book – Star Trek: Open a Channel: A Woman’s Trek!
- Out Today: “Star Trek #26”
- Star Trek Strange New Worlds Asylum Book Review
- John Jackson Miller Books Ranked!
- “Star Trek: The Next Generation: Headlong Flight” Review by Lessaccurategrandmother.blogspot.com
- Jumping into Adventure with “Into the Void”
- Happy 2024 Birthday to Jim Johnson!
- “Star Trek: Strange New Worlds: Asylum” Review by Trek.fm
- Movie Related Products
- “Deadpool & Wolverine” Review
- Kevin Smith Is Getting Closer and Closer to Dogma 2
- “The Garfield Movie” Review
- Disney Said to be Considering a Surprising Replacement for Bob Iger: EA CEO Andrew Wilson – IGN
- Amazon Is Shutting Down Freevee, Its Ad-Supported Video Streamer
- “Breathe” Review
- “Transformers One” Review
- Captain America: Brave New World | Official Trailer
- Marvel Studios’ Thunderbolts* | D23 Brazil Special Look | In Theaters May 2, 2025
- Mattel apologizes after mistakenly printing porn site on ‘Wicked’ movie dolls packaging | CNN Business
- Music Video DB
GET IT OFF MY INTERNET!
I agree with colonel-yum-yum
not only is it awkward I don’t understand the significance of the post
It’s a sweet tender moment between two men who like putting their penises into each other’s rectum. What’s so hard about that?
@gor
please don’t use the word hard near this picture, I just ate!
Hot Damn!
Man love!
Man love never hurt anybody… unless of course it was gritty, unlubricated, prison-gang-style man love. That has probably hurt a few unlucky individuals.
rape’s no picnic either
@... gor
I never saw the movie, but I question if they switch off between bottom and top. I guess I just assummed one was the giver the other the reciever and thats how their relationship worked.
People who are repulsed by two men together are repressing their own tendencies. A REAL heterosexual doesn’t get upset by what two OTHER men do.
I actually just learned that most cowboys of the old west were keen on sharing a sleeping bag with other cowboys. They used to tie scarfs on their arms and pretend to be ladies at dances, too. See what happens when there’s no women to be found? Also, most of these cowboys were openly homophobic when they weren’t busy bunking down with their trail mates. Truth is stranger than fiction.
It’s sad how easily disgusted people are by something they aren’t taking part in and are witnessing only in their minds (the anal sex is an assumed act, the image is of an affectionate embrace).
It’s unfortunate that men see themselves as disgusting. I really think that’s what it boils down to. I’m not suggesting that straight men should be attracted to men but they should be able to accept that OTHERS (women AND men) are.
I look forward to the time when I can enjoy men acting out on social expectations by making out with their best friends for the sexual amusement of their girlfriends. lol
@PaulCilwa
Took the words right out of my mouth! 🙂
Homosexuality has only been considered “gross” and such for the last couple hundred years. Before that, everyone slept with everyone and many wealthy men had preteen boys as “assistants”, including the Romans (except they called them “squires”).
p.s. Gay cowboys are effin’ HOT. You want to score with a chick? Put this movie on and act like it’s your favorite film ever.
Nonsense. Not only should society dictate what people do with their private lives, but the government should have a say in it as well.
What, do you think this is a free country or something?
I don’t hear anybody upset about two guys pleasuring each other. But “repulsed” is different from “upset”. I’m repulsed when someone I see a dog eat his own shit, but I’m not upset with it, it’s what they do. Same with gay guys, if it makes them happy to sodomize, that’s nice, but it’s something I really don’t want to watch.
Is that wrong?
It’s not wrong, it makes you secretly a bit gay is all.
“People who are repulsed by two men together are repressing their own tendencies. A REAL heterosexual doesn’t get upset by what two OTHER men do” = circular reasoning.
It would be like saying that a REAL heterosexual should dig seeing a chick being tied up and gagged and have a a guy piss on her (all consensual of course).
How you feel about others preferences or fetishes has no bearing on your own sexuality.
For the record, I am straight, and I watched Brokeback Mountain. My wife on the other hand did not want to see it.
An example of an over-hyped, mass-marketed piece of American bullshit cinema, if these guys were not portrayed as Gay cowboys, nobody would have bothered to see it, or at the very least people would have seen it for what it really is: BORING!
And I agree with Davist11, you gor are a sad, pathetic person who secretly yearns for a blowjob from a man because you don’t cant come to terms with your own latent homosexual tendencies…
Good night, sweet villain.
@Daskunt
you hit the nail right on the head. Everyone has their own spectrum of what they consider sexual comfortable. Sodomy is a little repulisive to me whether its homosexual or hetereosexual. Thats my own view, I might be repulsed by sodomy but I am still tolerant of it. Toleration doesnt require loving something or even accepting it, it just means allowing it to exist.
So tish01 & davies11, using your logic, if you are repulsed by someone shiting on other’s face, than that means you secretly want someone to shit on your face?
You guys are so confused.
@dgh4983
You haven’t lived till you’ve came in a girl’s ass.
Also, Gor, read Ecclesiastes butt humping is not a sin.
Never said it was, but even it is was a “sin” what do I care I’m not a Christian, Muslim nor Jew.
I don’t think anyone needs my permission or tolerance of their life. I don’t care what they think of my life and expect others to not-care about mine. There are 2 different definitions for tolerance: 1. a fair, objective, and permissive attitude toward opinions and practices that differ from one’s own. 2. the act or capacity of enduring; endurance. I’m fine w/ classifying myself w/ the 1st definition, but I think many people are using the 2nd.
Oops. Definitions from
dictionary.reference.com/browse/tolerance
@gor
No, it just makes you a homophobic wanker who wont take responsibility for his own homosexual tendencies.
LOL
“Wanker” eh, you must be one those british poofs. That’s sweet.