-
My[Confined]Space
Better Than Bread
Movies Coming Soon- Star Trek Books
- “Star Trek: Lower Decks – Warp Your Own Way” Review by Akotsko.substack.com
- Happy 2024 Birthday to Christie Golden!
- “Star Trek: Voyager: 16 Seven Of Nine” Review by Deepspacespines.com
- Nana Visitor Joins Us to Talk About Her New Book – Star Trek: Open a Channel: A Woman’s Trek!
- Out Today: “Star Trek #26”
- Star Trek Strange New Worlds Asylum Book Review
- John Jackson Miller Books Ranked!
- “Star Trek: The Next Generation: Headlong Flight” Review by Lessaccurategrandmother.blogspot.com
- Jumping into Adventure with “Into the Void”
- Happy 2024 Birthday to Jim Johnson!
- Movie Related Products
- “Deadpool & Wolverine” Review
- Kevin Smith Is Getting Closer and Closer to Dogma 2
- “The Garfield Movie” Review
- Disney Said to be Considering a Surprising Replacement for Bob Iger: EA CEO Andrew Wilson – IGN
- Amazon Is Shutting Down Freevee, Its Ad-Supported Video Streamer
- “Breathe” Review
- “Transformers One” Review
- Captain America: Brave New World | Official Trailer
- Marvel Studios’ Thunderbolts* | D23 Brazil Special Look | In Theaters May 2, 2025
- Mattel apologizes after mistakenly printing porn site on ‘Wicked’ movie dolls packaging | CNN Business
- Music Video DB
Invisible and non existing are two very different concepts.
Though you must admit DI did spend a whole lot of time “researching” a new name for Creation Science.
Just cross out the words intelligent and discovery with Jesus if you’re trying to figure out what’s what.
If by “teach the controversy,” they mean the one they’re manufacturing, then yes, we should teach kids how stupid and self-serving this crap is.
BAAAWWWWW!!
someone doesnt share my religious views!!
BAAAAWWWW!!!
it really is sad. first, people bagged on christians for blindly following scriptures and ignoring science, and now when someone tries to use science to tackle religion, even more bawwing
why dont you faggots go to the site and find something that these people say that backs up your worldveiw.
until then, you have become that which you loathe
@natedog
I went to the site.
It is pure faggotry.
pure faggotry?
then you shouldn’t have much trouble pointing out something retarded.
why don’t you go there and bring some such thing here except name calling?
i have never been there, but if you’re gonna call ‘faggotry’ at least point out something specific.
just because people claim god is real and that there is some science that backs them up, does not make them faggots.
find something they say backs up the existence of god, then refute it if they are wrong. simple. but not as simple calling them faggots, however.
“just because people claim god is real and that there is some science that backs them up, does not make them faggots.”
Right. They are faggots, because their arguments have been refuted 100 times and they still pretend they have something to say about evolution.
“find something they say backs up the existence of god, then refute it if they are wrong. simple. but not as simple calling them faggots, however.”
Your first day on the internet? Check out their books, then check the reviews from scientists and you’ll see.