@Musashi1584
Actually there are a couple of ways to do this, and not all of them require a monster computer with quad processors and ungodly amounts of RAM. They are all really, really, expensive though…
Either way there is waay more real estate here than is really practical. And the monitors are really not well arranged. At least not for gaming.
Who’s gonna want to swivel their heads 180 degrees just to see whose on either side of them? More importantly, who would do all of this and then use it to play Quake instead of say Crysis or F.E.A.R. ? 🙂
Tiki, is this yours? I think you’re making too much money.
I don’t think I’d be able to use this properly.
thats so horrible what’s the point? you can’t see everything to great and i bet that eats up a fuck ton of ram just to operate.
definitely overkill. definitely.
Congrats. You’re using a crappy gyration mouse to play Quake. Double lol.
at 15 FPS…
not mine, I have a dual monitor set up, and that’s a lot of monitor real estate enough for me
@Musashi1584
Actually there are a couple of ways to do this, and not all of them require a monster computer with quad processors and ungodly amounts of RAM. They are all really, really, expensive though…
Either way there is waay more real estate here than is really practical. And the monitors are really not well arranged. At least not for gaming.
Who’s gonna want to swivel their heads 180 degrees just to see whose on either side of them? More importantly, who would do all of this and then use it to play Quake instead of say Crysis or F.E.A.R. ? 🙂
Lol, multi-monitor setups will always be flawed until they can properly figure out how to make screens with no borders
Phyreblade is right, Half-Life 2 and CS:S would look epic on that set-up.
My widescreen is plenty enough. This is just too much.