LukeV1-5… why not? .. pregnancy takes 9 months and you don’t have to be alive to become father:
harry died 30.apr 1919.
james died 27.apr 1926 aged 6.
so obviously james was born between 26th april 1920 and 28th april 1919. supposing he didn’t die on his birthday.. 😉
and that matches that 9-month period after harry’s birthday very well.
When I was younger there was a graveyard between my school and downtown that I’d take as a shortcut. It was a really old graveyard and they hadn’t buried anyone there in years save the odd family plot.
This looks fake to me…
same here
that looks more than fake, it IS fake
I hope someone realizes that it said that James was 6 years old when he died.
I think it means James was Harry’s son. Which is still fail, because he died 7 years after his father.
You guysn newer thinked that maybe there are OTHER people called Harry Potter? 😀
Yeah. Seriously…
i don’t think that’s fake..
LukeV1-5… why not? .. pregnancy takes 9 months and you don’t have to be alive to become father:
harry died 30.apr 1919.
james died 27.apr 1926 aged 6.
so obviously james was born between 26th april 1920 and 28th april 1919. supposing he didn’t die on his birthday.. 😉
and that matches that 9-month period after harry’s birthday very well.
.. i find those dates rather amazing..
Like your math Fab.
Yes totally plausable. funny the story was the opposite way – james the father harry the dad…wonder where the photo really was taken…
Unfunny.
Barbaric!
When I was younger there was a graveyard between my school and downtown that I’d take as a shortcut. It was a really old graveyard and they hadn’t buried anyone there in years save the odd family plot.
It’s amazing how young people died back then