FFFFFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU

You fucking illiterate, intentionally stupid, pridefully ignorant moron. Do you work at being so blindingly dumb?

“have fun”

You aren’t clever, you sad little fuckwit. Why do you accept this bit of scientific evidence, but not the evidence connecting humans to other hominids, the anthropoid apes, and all the way back to sinapsids, then amphibians and fish? We could easily keep going. Why is a mitochondrial Eve acceptable as a product of science, but evolution is not?

Because you are a hopeless idiot.

You actually quoted that fucktard and professional liar and scam artist Ken Ham.

Evolution is not a religion. No matter how much you believe this, it isn’t true.

Evolution is a scientific theory, and therefore is the best explanation of the available evidence, explaining a broad range of phenomenons. It has yet to be disproved, although it has been revised as better evidence is procured.

It does not require any level of faith. We have the fossils and the comparative genomics and the pseudogenes and the endogenous retroviruses. We have the evidence. That means no faith is needed.

Your little copypasta storytime is a piece of shit. It is making the assumption that the scientific process allows for nothing but first person observation of an event. That is painfully incorrect. If it were true, then nobody could ever be prosecuted for a crime without eyewitnesses. I cannot help that the fictional prof in that plagiarized proverb is ignorant of the function of temperature and uses descriptive terms.

I also cannot help that you are completely ignorant of the same when Eve and Adam are used as metaphors for a limited genetic pool of individuals at two separate population bottlenecks. You went no further than what somebody else wrote in a fit of prideful cleverness, never mind that the conclusion that you come to is not in any way correct.

Science itself has no flaws. Scientists do. The process is good and it works. Bad measurements can be taken. Incorrect observations can be made. People’s biases can interfere with interpreting data. And so we work to prevent such mistakes with multiple measurements, careful recording and duplication of observers or observations, eliminating biases by repeating other scientists experiments and examining results with careful statistics.

I have never seen the brain of a creationist, but I am certain that if I were to cut away the scalp and open the skull of even such a reprobate as Ken Ham, I would find a brain there. Why? Because nobody has found a functioning person without a brain. It is extremely unlikely that I would find him to be brainless. I have no reason to suspect otherwise, but should you like to offer yourself up for experimentation and we can secure IRB approval, I’m sure we can check to see if you have one, and I’d be happy to poke at it a few times just to be able to tell you that it was there. Hell, since you would have to be awake for the procedure, I’m sure you could reach up and give it a poke, too.

I actually could prove that the birth certificate of Obama is real by examination and comparison of its paper to others from the same month, check the typeface, examine the ink by chemical processes. I could easily determine that in fact that the paper is a real and accurate document. I could examine copies of newspapers that announce the birth and verify their authenticity. I could demonstrate that beyond a reasonable doubt that Obama was born in Hawaii.

😉

Ital, you are a liar and scoundrel. I have no reason to believe your claim of converted scientists. It sounds like you are just repeating something from Lee Strobel, another professional liar for Jesus who claims, quite unconvincingly, to be a former atheist. Further more, intelligent design is disproved by looking at any part of the body. The heart seems amazing until you realize that it is based on a very simple reptilian design and has no backup circulation mechanism to ensure that a small blockage is not fatal. This is a mistake that no semi intelligent engineer would make, meaning that your intelligent designer is dumber than any living human with a few years of experience and a bare level of technical knowhow.

As for the birth certificate, you can make your claim that others have demonstrated that it is fake, but again, you are just repeating the claims of cranks. Odd how conspiracy theorists never stop with just one. I would have shown, via science, that the document was real. That there were multiple sources of documentation. That should be enough to demonstrate, forensically, that there is no good reason to believe that Obama was born anywhere else.

We have evidence of macro evolution. We have observed macro evolution. Don’t be a complete and total scientific illiterate. There is no magical barrier between small change and large change. As you have lunch today, munching on corn chips and eating bread made from wheat, you are eating something that is the product of evolution within recorded history, due to polypoid duplications and cross species pollination. Here are a couple other examples.
talkorigins.org/indexcc/CB/CB910.html
talkorigins.org/indexcc/CC/CC200.html
Not mentioned here is evidence of the development of a cecal valve in a Mediterranean lizard transplanted to a new island, or the evolution of new metabolic pathways in carefully examined bacteria.

We have the proof, you have only ignorance. The only excuse you could have to not know of these verifiable facts is that you prefer to remain ignorant and not risk your faith. That you choose to try to spread the contagion of ignorance makes you a disgusting individual.

The Helmholtz contraction is of no concern as stars have been observed to expand and contract over periods of time. There is no reason to assume that our sun acts in a different manner.

You can claim that mitochondrial Eve was really Edenic Eve, and that genetic Adam was really Noah, but thats just a hopeful wish with no evidence at all. Why do you accept one set of evidence arrived at by the scientific method, but not others?

Finding stone tools in rock layers that are “too old” is also not a concern. Rocks erode, and sedimentary rocks are especially easy to erode. A tool ends up on an eroded bedrock and then ends up buried. Thats it. In fact, something similar happened where a modern hammer was found in calcium carbonate rock (which can be deposited rapidly) on top of fossil bearing cretaceous rocks.

Give it up. You are anomaly hunting. Your god only exists where science has not yet looked. As we look closer and closer, your god has fewer places to hide and gets smaller and smaller.

ID. Either start paraphrasing these arguments and quit cutting and pasting from creationist midden heaps or get the fuck out. Until you do this, I will continue to call you out for being a disrespectful rotting piece of cum stained fecal matter, drying in the sun, only to be eaten by flies, vomited forth again and swallowed once more to be shat out in its original form.

As long as you disrespect me by putting forth copied and pasted lies, offering no good faith effort to try to find just one strong piece of evidence by fact checking, I will continue to give you the appropriate level of respect that any inbred fuckstick deserves.

“I love finding things like that the current gravatational energy of the planets in our solar system are consistent with a approx 6,000 year old universe.”

Just another unsupported lie. There would be no way of telling the difference between a solar system created with the current planetary motion, one created last Tuesday and one that developed in the ways proposed by cosmologists by observing planetary nebulae and acretion disks. However, since we can see light from stars more than 6000 light years distant, along with a plethora of other evidence based details, it is far more reasonable to accept a modern science based explanation instead of a bronze age one.

“I also find it interesting that Saturn and Juter are putting off more energy that could be accounted for by just reflecting light from the Sun. Some other things I just pasted below for full effect.”

Lie. talkorigins.org/indexcc/CE/CE231.html

I know you probably will just respond with things like “you ignorant fuck” but I would much prefer links and quotes showing any fallacies in the information that I have come across.

True. You ignorant fuck.

“I have been double checking ddates to make sure I am looking at recent findings. I was being a dunce before in quoteing and referenceing old material that has since been updated.”

But you never bothered to check if it was correct or presented honestly. That is why you always fail. You also seem to find simple spell checking impossible.

“Fast Facts”

Explosive Diarrhea.

-Spiral galaxies rotate much too quickly for an old universe. They would be twisted beyond recognition if they were really as old as secular astronomers claim

Lie. talkorigins.org/indexcc/CE/CE380.html

-The magnetic fields of planets and moons in our solar system are consistent with their age of a few thousand years, but are much too strong for an age of billions of years.

Lie. talkorigins.org/indexcc/CD/CD701.html

-The debris shed by disintegrating comets is what causes meteor showers. Since earth intersects such a debris field once each year, most meteor showers are annual.

So what? This is a non sequitur. Planets clear out most of the detritus in their path, so new material from comet trails would be expected as the primary source of meteor showers as opposed to meteorites.

“Researchers have hypothesized that nuclear reactions are occurring in the core of Jupiter…”

Please maintain some form of reasonable formatting in your treatises. Your Jovian baloney is dealt with above, but never mind that without sufficient oxygen, hydrogen does not burn and the mass of Jupiter is insufficient for fusion. The heat of any planetary body is likely multifactorial, including dynamic motion of the liquid helium core, while your lie is based on the assumption that there is only a single source.

“The definition of a star is any large…”

Jupiter and Neptune do not have fusion reactions within them, and you, Ken Ham, and his pet scientist/scam artists are complete idiots who can’t even be bothered keeping your beliefs in the realm of reasonable science fiction. I feel for his fake scientists. They can’t hold real jobs in academics because they get wrapped up in pathological levels of faith and ignore the duties of their jobs. It must be very tempting to rip off scientifically illiterate mouth breathers like yourself for donations and speaking fees, especially when it pays better than being a real working researcher. The worst part of it is that they took up a student slot that could have been taken by someone who would produce work for society instead of living as an unproductive parasite.

Do you understand this? Ham, Hovind, Behe, Gish and their failed scientist lackeys are parasites living off of happy idiots like you and produce nothing whatsoever of worth. And when one of you shit for brains gets on a board of education and tries to push ignorance in the place of science, you always end up wasting incredible amounts of taxpayer money, because you always lose. You prevent kids from getting the education they should have, first in those that are taught baseless mythologies, and then in those that come later, when a lawsuit impoverished school system has to let teachers go, not buy computers, or even pay to have the lights on for a full school year, leading to shortened terms.

“Did you know that George Darwin, the astronomer son of the famous Charles Darwin, discovered that the moon is slowly spiraling away from the earth.”

Lie. talkorigins.org/indexcc/CE/CE110.html talkorigins.org/faqs/hovind/howgood-yea.html#proof5

George Darwin would give you much deserved kick in the balls.

“Similar evidence comes from the sun…”

And you just have to finish it up with more lies. talkorigins.org/indexcc/CE/CE311.html

What have you learned from this? Apparently nothing. You haven’t figured out that not one of your arguments works beyond a simple glance. In fact, not a single one of your arguments is new. Creationists have no new hypotheses, just repetitions of long disproved streams of bullshit. Thats why I can just skim through a list of creationist claims and find all of yours right there. Your beliefs are out of date and unsupported by science, and yet, you point to an out of context concept such as MitoEve and ChromAdam with complete acceptance.

Why is it that you accept some science when it appears supportive but reject everything else?

I’ve asked you this repeatedly, but you won’t answer it. If your Bronze age creation myth, plagiarized from the Babylonians, is so important to you, why do you even try to support it with science? Isn’t it good enough to stand on its own, or does it need a thick lacquering of lies and bullshit for you stomach it? Is your faith so weak that realizing that one little detail in your not so Good Book is wrong, that the rest of it might be too?