Besides, everyone knows women can’t be crazy pedos, they don’t have penises! I don’t even know why they bother putting all those horny teachers through trials, those boys were lucky to score with older ladies.
While both male and females can have social underdevelopment, the males are the ones who REALLY take the fall.
If a male teacher were to have sex or even kiss a female student, it would look very bad. But if a female teacher were to do it, it doesn’t look as bad.
I remember the “barbie” teacher and the news reporters saying she was underdeveloped so teenage boys were at her mental or sexual level.
She was obviously quite capable of making a living for herself and got as far as becoming a teacher, but something in her life has stunted her sexual growth. Maybe she just never had a boyfriend or was raped or something – it could be anything.
And even after all that being said, it’s nobody’s fault.
You can’t blame anyone for how they are or how they grew up, how they were raised or what happened in their childhood.
They need help, not prosecution – unless they were violent offenders or did something really bad.
If a male teacher kisses a female student in high school, it’s not nearly as bad as an elementary teacher doing the same.
It’s up to the person to decide if they want help or not.
you really shouldnt take this kind of thing so lightly. the reason there’s a “double standard” is that there is way more old guys with boners looking to rape teenies than “cougars” hunting down boys below the legal age.
they need help AND prosecution. the one will do less without the other.
“If a male teacher kisses a female student in high school, it’s not nearly as bad as an elementary teacher doing the same.”
no fucking shit? i guess id prefer psychological trauma and possibly anxiety and shame over having my sexuality ruined forever, but i heard passing on both would be good.
Yay, yet another angry internet denizen realizes that there is, in some small way, a double standard based on gender. So glad that he whipped up this crappy poster to show us all the error of our ways. 😐
Reminds me of every 19-year old woman who took their first women’s study course and went around lambasting every boy they caught absent-mindedly staring at the scantily clad coed who walked by. I remember my response to “aren’t you ashamed of yourself?”: “no. Why should I be?”
Look (directed at creator of this, not OP), yes there are double standards. There are double standards for everything. It cuts both ways–a guy who sleeps with a lot of women is an accomplished dude while a woman in the same position is a slut. This (the Twilight example) is middle age women reliving the temultuousness of their middle-school/early high school days in a relatively safe way. Guys do that by looking up pictures of 18-29 year-old women in cheerleader outfits or catholic schoolgirl uniforms. If the women actually try to act out their relivings (not exactly sure how in this case, unless you know some real vampires), it would be as bad as a guy who wanted to see actual schoolgirls in those outfits, and should be treated as such.
Yeah, I gotta learn to stop posting once my sleep meds start working. Rough translation: double standards exist because they have to. Twilight moms are the equivalent of guys who jerk off to pictures of adult women wearing catholic schoolgirl uniforms: they are reliving their sexual glory years. Guys who get off on Kristin Stewart are different. They are genuinely lusting after women under 18. That is not what the Twilight moms are doing. whomever made this poster seems to not understand the difference.
A fun thing to do: watch any commercial which has a male and female playing out some role. Then reverse their roles in your mind and see how absurd the commercial would be.
I haven’t heard any “Twilight Dads” talking about Kristen Stewart. She looks like a boy with long hair.
It’s hypothetical.
Besides, everyone knows women can’t be crazy pedos, they don’t have penises! I don’t even know why they bother putting all those horny teachers through trials, those boys were lucky to score with older ladies.
Raging yet?
A double standard, yet again.
While both male and females can have social underdevelopment, the males are the ones who REALLY take the fall.
If a male teacher were to have sex or even kiss a female student, it would look very bad. But if a female teacher were to do it, it doesn’t look as bad.
I remember the “barbie” teacher and the news reporters saying she was underdeveloped so teenage boys were at her mental or sexual level.
She was obviously quite capable of making a living for herself and got as far as becoming a teacher, but something in her life has stunted her sexual growth. Maybe she just never had a boyfriend or was raped or something – it could be anything.
And even after all that being said, it’s nobody’s fault.
You can’t blame anyone for how they are or how they grew up, how they were raised or what happened in their childhood.
They need help, not prosecution – unless they were violent offenders or did something really bad.
If a male teacher kisses a female student in high school, it’s not nearly as bad as an elementary teacher doing the same.
It’s up to the person to decide if they want help or not.
Wow. That is actually one of the smartest things you have ever said Graham.
You shut your mouth!
you really shouldnt take this kind of thing so lightly. the reason there’s a “double standard” is that there is way more old guys with boners looking to rape teenies than “cougars” hunting down boys below the legal age.
they need help AND prosecution. the one will do less without the other.
“If a male teacher kisses a female student in high school, it’s not nearly as bad as an elementary teacher doing the same.”
no fucking shit? i guess id prefer psychological trauma and possibly anxiety and shame over having my sexuality ruined forever, but i heard passing on both would be good.
The difference is, the boys dont care, but the girls do
Dads don’t care about Twilight. Not when there’s Harry Potter movies…
Yeah, that Daniel Radcliffe is such a tight piece of ass.
Yay, yet another angry internet denizen realizes that there is, in some small way, a double standard based on gender. So glad that he whipped up this crappy poster to show us all the error of our ways. 😐
Reminds me of every 19-year old woman who took their first women’s study course and went around lambasting every boy they caught absent-mindedly staring at the scantily clad coed who walked by. I remember my response to “aren’t you ashamed of yourself?”: “no. Why should I be?”
Look (directed at creator of this, not OP), yes there are double standards. There are double standards for everything. It cuts both ways–a guy who sleeps with a lot of women is an accomplished dude while a woman in the same position is a slut. This (the Twilight example) is middle age women reliving the temultuousness of their middle-school/early high school days in a relatively safe way. Guys do that by looking up pictures of 18-29 year-old women in cheerleader outfits or catholic schoolgirl uniforms. If the women actually try to act out their relivings (not exactly sure how in this case, unless you know some real vampires), it would be as bad as a guy who wanted to see actual schoolgirls in those outfits, and should be treated as such.
That last paragraph made no sense.
Yeah, I gotta learn to stop posting once my sleep meds start working. Rough translation: double standards exist because they have to. Twilight moms are the equivalent of guys who jerk off to pictures of adult women wearing catholic schoolgirl uniforms: they are reliving their sexual glory years. Guys who get off on Kristin Stewart are different. They are genuinely lusting after women under 18. That is not what the Twilight moms are doing. whomever made this poster seems to not understand the difference.
Maybe that makes more sense.
Yes it does. I’ve made some doozy comments when I’m tired…or drugged.
A fun thing to do: watch any commercial which has a male and female playing out some role. Then reverse their roles in your mind and see how absurd the commercial would be.