Enrique Tarrio’s attorney said, it would be an “injustice” to hold the defendants culpable and allow Trump to not be held accountable for his own actions.

Added on January 14th, 2023 by theseusptosis | Report Post
Sub-Tag:PoliticalHumor

2 Comments

Inline Feedbacks

View all comments

Karl Lewis (#191444)

1 year ago

IANAL, but… I gotta say, “Sure, my client robbed the bank, but it’s unfair to prosecute him unless you also prosecute the guy who planned it, too”, doesn’t really seem like the *best* defense. It maybe sounded better in his head, than it did out loud. I can hardly wait to see what the jury thinks of it. I mean, from where I’m sitting, it looks remarkably like a confession.

FullofStars (#3921)

Reply to Karl Lewis

1 year ago

The goal is “Whataboutism”. “You can’t hold my client accountable until *checks list* those 354 other persons are held accountable”. The goal posts will always be moved. It is a set of false equivalency arguments. It is just a weaselly distraction technique. It pushes problem to other group to expend 10x the effort to demonstrate bullshit is infact, bullshit.