Five years later and we’re still going through the same cycle:
- Media makes outrageous claim
- Shitlibs screech “Hah! Gottem! Drumph!!!”
- Claim gets thoroughly debunked
- Media quietly retracts story (but only if there might be legal trouble, otherwise… f*ck it)
- Media makes new outrageous claim
nymag.com/intelligencer/2021/07/steele-dossier-was-case-study-in-journalistic-manipulation.html
Huh. I thought everything in here has been proven true other than the pee pee tape.
You thought wrong. Most of the claims in the dossier were the fabrications of two alcoholic PR agents in Prague. Even Steele himself said most of the claims were “50-50”. The only people saying none of the accusation have been proven false are James Clapper and Fox News host Shepard Smith, so good work on that:
www.wsj.com/articles/russian-in-cyprus-was-behind-key-parts-of-discredited-dossier-on-trump-11603901989
strange, the guardian article (after this piece) was just more conformation. but if you rightard still believe trumps the second coming…well good for you morons.
one more thing. nothing in the dossier has been proven untrue . trumps ass kissing performance in Helsinki should have woken any shit for brains rightard. but it didn’t.
Is that right?
www.wsj.com/articles/russian-in-cyprus-was-behind-key-parts-of-discredited-dossier-on-trump-11603901989
Maybe you ought to watch more news than Rachel Maddow. Even the courts say no reasonable person would take what she says seriously.
fucking moron, it was a foxnews lawyer talking about foxnews….
www.businessinsider.com/fox-news-karen-mcdougal-case-tucker-carlson-2020-9
Dear oh dear, dog fucker… you’re not really good at this, are you?
thehill.com/homenews/media/499294-judge-dismisses-one-america-news-defamation-lawsuit-against-rachel-maddow
Maybe stick to colouring and eating paste.
Let’s talk about burden and proof and proving a negative.
I allege that you, smeg, fuck dogs. It is my claim that your every waking moment is occupied by going balls-deep in the nearest canine you can find. It is up to you to prove me wrong, dog fucker, and until you can, I will open address you as ‘The One Who Fucks Dogs.
See how this works, One Who Fucks Dogs?
projection is the conservatives friend.
Dipshit: the authors of The Guardian article openly admit they do not know what’s in the appendix referenced which supposedly elaborates on the most incendiary claim. Oh, and the ever-reliable “Western intelligence agencies” are the authoritative sources behind these claims. Oh, and lead writer is a widely-known bullshit artist with a proven history of fake stories and making unsubstantiated claims.
Did you even read the fucking thing?
Keep schilling for Russia, comrade….
“Not content with getting humiliated himself any more, observe how the orbiter must now participate in the humiliation of others in order to become sexually aroused…”
Attempting the humiliation of others seems to be your ballywick, but now that you’ve brought sexual gratification into it; you’re starting to show your hand. eww that didn’t sound quite right.