read your own comment. what difference is there if mommy or daddy dies being a cop? the kid could want to sue either way. face facts you’re too sexist to see logic right in front of you.
Yes, daddy could end up full of holes too, and the kids could want to sue ACLU, if it “helped” him the way they “helped” her.
BUT, the picture is about mommy, so “congratulations” on going half retard.
my mistake , you said “guess who the kid is going to sue” my guess would be the city and department that she worked for. suing lawyers you hired rarely works out for people, but cities and departments often have budgets for paying off lawsuits. sorry you didn’t figure that into your equation
Instead of suing the organization that put her (back) on the street, where she got* shot (“helpful” ACLU), you want to sue the organization, that wanted to not put her (back) on the street (police department that vowed to get rid of her).
That’s some whacked logic you got there.
and you don’t know how to hit a reply button? I explained the choice, logic has little to do with the legal system in the US. lawyers sue where they can get money , NOT where logic dictates.
You know, for citizens of a notoriously litigious society, you guys sure don’t know much about how this all works, do you? Why the fuck would they sue the organization that assisted her in fighting for her right to have a job she was qualified for? They would sue her employer for failing to provide safeguards (training, backup, whatever) that could have prevented the fatality. Now fuck off, the lot of ya, before I sue you all for pissing me off.
bingo!! that’s what I was saying. he’s just listened to that right wing babble so long he figures anything like the aclu must be evil and out to destroy america
Guess who the kids gonna sue, when mommy ends up with “fatal lead poisoning” ?
like that couldn’t happen if it was the father in question??
Either we’re looking at different pictures, or you’re assuming too much.
read your own comment. what difference is there if mommy or daddy dies being a cop? the kid could want to sue either way. face facts you’re too sexist to see logic right in front of you.
Yes, daddy could end up full of holes too, and the kids could want to sue ACLU, if it “helped” him the way they “helped” her.
BUT, the picture is about mommy, so “congratulations” on going half retard.
my mistake , you said “guess who the kid is going to sue” my guess would be the city and department that she worked for. suing lawyers you hired rarely works out for people, but cities and departments often have budgets for paying off lawsuits. sorry you didn’t figure that into your equation
Instead of suing the organization that put her (back) on the street, where she got* shot (“helpful” ACLU), you want to sue the organization, that wanted to not put her (back) on the street (police department that vowed to get rid of her).
That’s some whacked logic you got there.
and you don’t know how to hit a reply button? I explained the choice, logic has little to do with the legal system in the US. lawyers sue where they can get money , NOT where logic dictates.
As amusing as this is, I don’t have the time, nor will, to continue this any longer.
You know, for citizens of a notoriously litigious society, you guys sure don’t know much about how this all works, do you? Why the fuck would they sue the organization that assisted her in fighting for her right to have a job she was qualified for? They would sue her employer for failing to provide safeguards (training, backup, whatever) that could have prevented the fatality. Now fuck off, the lot of ya, before I sue you all for pissing me off.
bingo!! that’s what I was saying. he’s just listened to that right wing babble so long he figures anything like the aclu must be evil and out to destroy america