-
My[Confined]Space
Better Than Bread
Movies Coming Soon- Star Trek Books
- “Star Trek: Voyager: 16 Seven Of Nine” Review by Deepspacespines.com
- Nana Visitor Joins Us to Talk About Her New Book – Star Trek: Open a Channel: A Woman’s Trek!
- Out Today: “Star Trek #26”
- Star Trek Strange New Worlds Asylum Book Review
- John Jackson Miller Books Ranked!
- “Star Trek: The Next Generation: Headlong Flight” Review by Lessaccurategrandmother.blogspot.com
- Jumping into Adventure with “Into the Void”
- Happy 2024 Birthday to Jim Johnson!
- “Star Trek: Strange New Worlds: Asylum” Review by Trek.fm
- Beadle & Grimm Interview With StarTrekBookClub.com
- Movie Related Products
- “Deadpool & Wolverine” Review
- Kevin Smith Is Getting Closer and Closer to Dogma 2
- “The Garfield Movie” Review
- Disney Said to be Considering a Surprising Replacement for Bob Iger: EA CEO Andrew Wilson – IGN
- Amazon Is Shutting Down Freevee, Its Ad-Supported Video Streamer
- “Breathe” Review
- “Transformers One” Review
- Captain America: Brave New World | Official Trailer
- Marvel Studios’ Thunderbolts* | D23 Brazil Special Look | In Theaters May 2, 2025
- Mattel apologizes after mistakenly printing porn site on ‘Wicked’ movie dolls packaging | CNN Business
- Music Video DB
You can always tell it’s a conservative trying to be funny when they miss the point completely with ugly watermarks.
Ad hominem attacks are usually a good sign too.
Who’s trying to be funny? The above is not humor or opinion. And you think that because she put on a good show covering up her atrocious core beliefs and motives this makes the above ad-hominem. Pathetic.
You forgot to throw in the word “cuck” as if it meant something.
Clinton later regretted voting for the Iraq war. She had opinions in the past that she has changed her mind on. People are allowed to change their minds over time. But sure, let’s just ignore that because it shreds your argument.
Because in the Conservative mindset there is no such thing as pragmatism….?
You know…picking someone a little more “presidential” than the guy who makes fun of the handicapped or believes he doesn’t need “intelligence” because he thinks he is smart.
She’s not a liberal.
But she is a grown up.
Perfect.
I’ve said it before, I’ll say it again: when the choice is between a neocon government pretending to be liberal, that is, business-as-usual that doesn’t really have your best interest at heart, vs a flaming mixture of napalm and feces smeared on your face every day for four years, have the wisdom to choose wisely.
(sorry, America)
This site is so liberal that I cannot believe that every comment isn’t started with “I’m literally shaking……”
Both candidates were white, nominally Christian and have significant ties to large corporations. As far as I can tell, support for the Iraq war isn’t by any means divided on liberal/conservative lines, and the other candidate wasn’t in a position to vote on the issue so no comparison can be made. So as far as ‘wanting’ Hillary (vs Trump), none of these points are relevant.
actually it’s pretty well documented that he was for the war then changed his mind about 2 years later , so that would pretty much tie things up on this comparison chart.
?
What has Trump’s war support (or not) have anything to do with Clinton being a liberal or not?
You seem to have lost your own plot Dirk.
Not surprising though….
It’s not about whether Clinton is a liberal or not, it’s about Clinton being the one that liberals want. It came down to two choices, so only the comparison between the two is relevant.
You got someone’s attention Tiki, now your site is under assault by alt right trolls. Too bad, this was a nice place.
I’m fine by it, at least they’ll get a scoop full of common sense before they leave.
Maybe.
let’s try NOT to forget she is NOT who democrats wanted , THEY WANTED BERNIE
Didn’t she win the nomination…?
“win”
The only reason she lost was Comey .. no wait .. fake news .. no wait .. Russians ..no wait … more to follow
Whoever said “the only reason”….?
There were many reasons why she lost.
A prevalence of the kind of fuzzy logic you exhibit among low information voters is a good example of one of them Skandy…
Self-awareness normally limits any temptation I might have to mock the prose of others … but come on!! … You’re always banging on about how you’re one of the smart kids. Did you read your last?
I once met a teacher who maintained that it was most important to “get words down on paper” and that coherence, grammar, syntax, logic etc. were secondary. I think the premise was that the secondary stuff would eventually catch up. You are proof either that she was wrong or that the timeframe is extremely impractical. (She was in primary education)
Read it again Skandy.
Slowly this time.
You just might understand it the second or third time through.
Or not….we’ve already established that comprehension isn’t one of your stronger suits.
But don’t give up trying….