-
My[Confined]Space
Better Than Bread
Movies Coming Soon- Star Trek Books
- “Star Trek: Lower Decks #2” Review by Aiptcomics.com
- AFRO SAMURAI’S Takashi Okazaki Brings Manga Flair to STAR TREK: DEFIANT Comics
- Out Today: “Star Trek: Lower Decks (2024) #2”
- Out Today: “Star Trek #27”
- New Star Trek Book: “Star Trek III: The Search for Spock – The Making of the Classic Film”
- Happy 2024 Birthday to J.M. Dillard!
- “Star Trek: Picard: Firewall” Review by Theforgottenfiction.com
- RIP David A. McIntee
- John Jay Alumnus Derek Attico Discusses New Autobiography at Book Talk
- Preview of “Star Trek: Lower Decks #2”
- Sexy Images of Sexy people
- My face bringing freckles to the front
- Can I be your favourite redhead bartender? 😘
- love the backview of my one piece suit
- Just a little selfie after my workout 💕
- Brown hair and freckles
- When the dress hugs just right, everything feels perfect
- Holy smokes
- Too tight but I love it
- Never too old to play dress up
- My first post here, hello!
- Movie Related Products
- ‘Subscribers Were Overwhelmed’: How Disney Made Streaming Profitable
- Silo ordered for full four season run
- “The Muppet Christmas Carol” Review
- Alex Garland at the BFI – The VFX in Civil War | Framestore
- STAR WARS FILIBUSTER: Patton Oswalt’s Rant Animated – Geek Week
- The WWE Network Is Officially Shutting Down Ahead Of Netflix Move
- “Deadpool & Wolverine” Review
- Kevin Smith Is Getting Closer and Closer to Dogma 2
- “The Garfield Movie” Review
- Disney Said to be Considering a Surprising Replacement for Bob Iger: EA CEO Andrew Wilson – IGN
- Music Video DB
This website brought to you by The Tiki Web Group Unless specifically mentioned, we have no clue where this content came from. Know where it came from? Post the link in the comments, and reap the glory! All comments and content are the sole possesion of the commenters and members of the community and do not reflect the opinions or values of MCS.
Yeah, so I’ve been seeing this kind of images in the net.
Could someone elaborate ?
some shitty with ads
Yeah, what is happening is YouTube decided to state demonetizing videos they don’t like. And the guide lines are so broad that they can chose to ban anything they want. They are a private company so it is their right, but they have been selectively censoring some YouTubers and not others. Many of the videos that are being censored are small news channels, while YouTube doesn’t touch the actual news channels on Youtube like CNN.
With this new move they are trying to force out what has made YouTube grow so much in the past years and make it all Toy reviews and unboxing videos. That’s fine we just need another video service that can be a real competitor to YouTube so they can feel what it is like when content creators leave and they backpedal liek they always do.
This all comes on the heels of all the problems with WTFU (Where’s The Fair Use) which has been happening with YouTube as well. In general like all companies that have grown large and popular YouTube is going through a bit of a phase of being a controlling asshole.
If YouTube wasn’t censored it would be YouPorn by now.
TLDR: It’s always been censored.
That is a a false equivalency fallacy. “They censor porn, so selectively censoring opinions is the same.” Uhhh no.
Something tells me I can live without the kind of “news” they’re “censoring”. I wish someone would censor half of the Far Left and Far Right garbage that’s all over the internet as it is, the World would be a better place.
And how is it a false equivalency? Porn isn’t speech anymore?
Censorship is Censorship and all web companies do it, as is their right.
While porn is legally free speech it’s a false equivalency because we are talking about socially acceptability of subject matter. Talking about a violent video game, news, or some other trivial subject is not directly proportional to double penetration of a publicly acceptable web site, not dedicated to porn, like YouTube.
Well seeing you have no idea what is being demonetized you don’t have the knowledge to make that determination. You are partially right. Those kinds of channels did get hit but others like boogie2988, I Hate Everything, and other reviewers have been affected too. Apathy doesn’t help.
But if I’m reading this correctly they can still publish anything they want, YouTube just isn’t going to pay them for it? There is no Right to be paid for videos you make, and if they’re still allowing them to be posted where’s the censorship?
Because these people have been doing this as a job now for years. This is what they do. It’s like your boss saying you can still come to work if you like and you aren’t fired, but you wont be getting paid.
Same goes here. They are free to keep making videos, which Youtube will continue to put adds one anyway, but they wont see a dime from making content for YouTube. If this is their job, and they are no longer getting payed for it, they will have to stop making videos. It’s censorship through monetary strong arming. YouTube is a private company and it is their right to do so, but it is a very shitty thing to do and it does not make it not censorship in a backhanded way.
Youtube wants more kid friendly content on the sight and this is how they have chosen to force people out, through their wallets.
It’s not their “job”….it’s their business.
That’s the risk of running a business…that the rules or regulations change making your business model obsolete.
Happens every day.
And the risk of monopolies.