I don’t understand why they aren’t wearing anything that fits right.
-
My[Confined]Space
Better Than Bread
Movies Coming Soon- Star Trek Books
- Happy 2024 Birthday to Christie Golden!
- “Star Trek: Voyager: 16 Seven Of Nine” Review by Deepspacespines.com
- Nana Visitor Joins Us to Talk About Her New Book – Star Trek: Open a Channel: A Woman’s Trek!
- Out Today: “Star Trek #26”
- Star Trek Strange New Worlds Asylum Book Review
- John Jackson Miller Books Ranked!
- “Star Trek: The Next Generation: Headlong Flight” Review by Lessaccurategrandmother.blogspot.com
- Jumping into Adventure with “Into the Void”
- Happy 2024 Birthday to Jim Johnson!
- “Star Trek: Strange New Worlds: Asylum” Review by Trek.fm
- Movie Related Products
- “Deadpool & Wolverine” Review
- Kevin Smith Is Getting Closer and Closer to Dogma 2
- “The Garfield Movie” Review
- Disney Said to be Considering a Surprising Replacement for Bob Iger: EA CEO Andrew Wilson – IGN
- Amazon Is Shutting Down Freevee, Its Ad-Supported Video Streamer
- “Breathe” Review
- “Transformers One” Review
- Captain America: Brave New World | Official Trailer
- Marvel Studios’ Thunderbolts* | D23 Brazil Special Look | In Theaters May 2, 2025
- Mattel apologizes after mistakenly printing porn site on ‘Wicked’ movie dolls packaging | CNN Business
- Music Video DB
I don’t understand why they all have to be female, or indeed the need to remake Ghostbusters in the first place. If they really felt the urge to regurgitate it, a mixed sex team might have had a more interesting dynamic, but most of this lot are a known group quantity and have made money in the past. That’s Showbiz.
www.denofgeek.com/movies/ghostbusters/36169/ghostbusters-dan-aykroyd-confirms-cameo-role
Then there’s this. It’s possible that Aykroyd is so enthusiastic about it because he was a co-writer and maybe has a financial slice of the pie, in which case a re-hash would make him some money.
from what I understand, it’s not a remake, it’s a true sequel, where there’s GB franchises set up
No, it’s a remake. You understand nothing. 😛 Also, I think there’s a problem with the emoticons.
[quote]I don’t understand why they aren’t wearing anything that fits right.[/quote]
I, for one, thank FSM that it doesn’t.
Although the ones on the right could be butterfaces.
The original uniforms didn’t fit perfectly, either.
“I don’t understand why they aren’t wearing anything that fits right.”
Because it sucks, that’s why. This will fucking fail, as it should. Pointless.
I was hoping for something a little more like this…
[img]http://www.angeles-hill.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/nutbusters.jpg[/img]
Revisionism has ‘fixed’ (as in a ‘trip to the vet’) a phallocentric franchise which supported privilege and the patriarchy. It might not support the shallow construct that is humour but I’m sure there will be many teachable moments. All hail The Narrative.
I wasted a lot of my best years getting various liberal arts degrees but I have never seen anything this bullshit-filled in my entire life.
“Shallow construct that is humour”? Get over yourself.
Weight and significance is suggested wrt your “best years” and “liberal arts degrees” (apparently too numerous to detail?) and the amazing scope of what you have seen … and I’m supposed to get over MYself? That was excellent. Thank you.
I kinda liked your deer jokes Skndrbg….I even up-thumb them.
But then you had to spoil my new found respect with all this pompous nonsense.
Back to your narrative it is then…..
I regret anything I did that might have elicited your approval.
JUST NO….. HORRIBLE COSTUMES. HORRIBLE CAST. LEAVE THE PAST ALONE!!!
www.imdb.com/name/nm0571952/?ref_=ttfc_fc_cl_t4
www.imdb.com/media/rm1488833792/nm0571952?ref_=nm_phs_md_6#
Kate McKinnon – The butter face chick on the right
I’ve yet to see anything that would make me want to watch this trainwreck.