Nativity scenes that are privately funded and set up by volunteers? A fire department house that wants to set one up on their own – can’t. Freedom baby! I understand how ‘simple’ has an attraction for you but .. ministers (privately funded) who don’t want to perform gay marriages? Religious hospitals (privately funded) that don’t want to perform late term abortions or sex changes? Existing displays (Mt Soledad) that require tax payer dollars to be dismantled? Those tax payer dollars that you worry so much about. Which presumably you actually do pay?
I’m not even religious. I just despise the red or brown shirt control weasels who tell everyone else where they’re supposed to stop thinking. Was any of that clear enough for you?

No more then about the disposition of your massive tax contribution? Public buildings are often used to promote privately held views: occupy, union thuggery or information displays, shoving down throats of views on fracking, etc. Many there even acting out while on the taxpayer clock. While Nativity scenes are generally not manned. (those are dolls) For many this would be a cultural item rather than a religious one.
Insisting that a specific padre in a specific church perform a gay marriage elevates a law over someone’s freedom of belief and freedom to practice their religion in a private building. More about the law then than about freedom? Ignoring the improbability of your reverence for all the law without reservation or “bigoted” socialist “views”, I recall that it was once against the law in much of Europe to be Jewish. That was a triumph for socialism over freedom.

“And they shouldn’t be.” WTF is this about? Can’t reason – go cryptic?
I see you are done with “freedom” but I’m not. Freedom allows all manner of leftardic propaganda organizations to preach “mythology and close-mindedness” with tax exempt status. A major difference between them and churches would be the general absence of any form of charity. (your ass?)