Negative percentage more deadly… old bayonet blade was triangular, producing a wound that bled more profusely and was very difficult to close up medically. Such blades are banned by international convention now, and surviving a stab from that modern “survival knife” is much more likely.
Zero percent more deadly?
With a scope for accuracy, what looks like a gas venting muzzle to reduce the recoil and a bi-pod for stability?
Must be one hell of a bad shooter to not get more deadly with those accessories.
Also keep in mind that this meme of silly libtards wanting to ban guns just because they have cosmetic changes is utterly absurd and an invention of gun-fetishists.
Now I want one of those 😀
SHUT UP AND TAKE MY MONEY!! 🙂
Negative percentage more deadly… old bayonet blade was triangular, producing a wound that bled more profusely and was very difficult to close up medically. Such blades are banned by international convention now, and surviving a stab from that modern “survival knife” is much more likely.
Zero percent more deadly?
With a scope for accuracy, what looks like a gas venting muzzle to reduce the recoil and a bi-pod for stability?
Must be one hell of a bad shooter to not get more deadly with those accessories.
I believe the point is if you’re shot by the first one, you’re just as dead if you’re shot by the second one, and vice versa
exactly, the accessories may increase the effectiveness of the shooter, but the damage is the same.
Keep in mind that a scope and a gas venting muzzle won’t help you. It’s still a muzzle loading musket.
Also keep in mind that this meme of silly libtards wanting to ban guns just because they have cosmetic changes is utterly absurd and an invention of gun-fetishists.
actually it’s an exercise in explaining that adding the word assault doesn’t make weapons more deadly or evil.