The irony being that numbers 1&4 are married, and have very close ties to Obama. Both worked to help him initially get elected to the senate before becoming president.
They are far left communist radicals who actively want to bring down America, and these are his people. And people wonder why conservatives fought so hard to keep him from getting elected. It’s also a damning indictment of the media for attempting to cover up his radical left connections and refusing to report on them pre-election.
“dangerous because of their known advocacy”. Why is that even listed? I would think “bombed stuff up” is adequate, but whoah once you put “advocacy” in there you know they’re really dangerous I guess?
Well, in 1970 white, middle-class men could be NBA stars. So…there’s that.
The irony being that numbers 1&4 are married, and have very close ties to Obama. Both worked to help him initially get elected to the senate before becoming president.
They are far left communist radicals who actively want to bring down America, and these are his people. And people wonder why conservatives fought so hard to keep him from getting elected. It’s also a damning indictment of the media for attempting to cover up his radical left connections and refusing to report on them pre-election.
Not to mention number 2 is now a teacher at Columbia university after 22 years in jail and number 1 at Minnesota state university.
Don’t get me wrong do the crime do the time and its over but being put in a role as an educator isn’t appropriate to me.
I see the red thumbs, think we found our liberals.
Better round ’em up, right?
“dangerous because of their known advocacy”. Why is that even listed? I would think “bombed stuff up” is adequate, but whoah once you put “advocacy” in there you know they’re really dangerous I guess?
ahh obama’s buddies.. how cute