I don’t see anything untoward or questionable about this. She’s not indecent and the move isn’t particularly “sexual.” I’d say, the goal was to show the flexibility and comfort of the clothing she’s wearing. Stop looking for drama where it’s not present.
Agreed. Pre-teens (AKA kids) exist and they are marketed to because they (have their parents) buy (them) clothes. It makes perfect sense that they would have their kid model do splits as opposed to their adult models because 1)they can, and 2) that’s something kids do that adults don’t, and is thus relevant in advertising kids fashion.
Seriously, this isn’t a “pre-teen” imitating a stripper’s pole-dance or something. It is a kid modelling kid’s fashion. Complain about targeting kids with advertising if you want, this particular picture has nothing controversial in it.
I don’t see anything untoward or questionable about this. She’s not indecent and the move isn’t particularly “sexual.” I’d say, the goal was to show the flexibility and comfort of the clothing she’s wearing. Stop looking for drama where it’s not present.
Agreed. Pre-teens (AKA kids) exist and they are marketed to because they (have their parents) buy (them) clothes. It makes perfect sense that they would have their kid model do splits as opposed to their adult models because 1)they can, and 2) that’s something kids do that adults don’t, and is thus relevant in advertising kids fashion.
Seriously, this isn’t a “pre-teen” imitating a stripper’s pole-dance or something. It is a kid modelling kid’s fashion. Complain about targeting kids with advertising if you want, this particular picture has nothing controversial in it.
Because it bothers you.