“Do [that] one” how? How is a watch comparable to DNA, really? A watch on a beach is non-living like the sand around it. What is not alive hasn’t genetic instructions for reproduction traits coded and readied, as is, but living animals with their DNA do. We do know how clocks – first the mechanical kind, and later electronic – atomic, and such, are manufactured and we know (or can know) how the inventors have done it. And even the most sophisticated complex working clocks pale in comparison to DNA, for lacking the kind of totally unique and uncopiable function they have, utilizing much much greater stores of information. We can program clocks to do amazing things, but none are anywhere near the observable marvels that the DNA strand the person has drawn above is. And please remember that the artist choose that in particular to illustrate a conviction that no creator being or beings exists. I didn’t assert anything out of the ordinary about DNA. I did think it an odd choice *for* atheism and said so. It seemed to point in the other direction (theism), I thought. That wasn’t unfair or mean of me to note, was it?