-
My[Confined]Space
Better Than Bread
Movies Coming Soon- Star Trek Books
- “Star Trek: Voyager: 16 Seven Of Nine” Review by Deepspacespines.com
- Nana Visitor Joins Us to Talk About Her New Book – Star Trek: Open a Channel: A Woman’s Trek!
- Out Today: “Star Trek #26”
- Star Trek Strange New Worlds Asylum Book Review
- John Jackson Miller Books Ranked!
- “Star Trek: The Next Generation: Headlong Flight” Review by Lessaccurategrandmother.blogspot.com
- Jumping into Adventure with “Into the Void”
- Happy 2024 Birthday to Jim Johnson!
- “Star Trek: Strange New Worlds: Asylum” Review by Trek.fm
- Beadle & Grimm Interview With StarTrekBookClub.com
- Movie Related Products
- “Deadpool & Wolverine” Review
- Kevin Smith Is Getting Closer and Closer to Dogma 2
- “The Garfield Movie” Review
- Disney Said to be Considering a Surprising Replacement for Bob Iger: EA CEO Andrew Wilson – IGN
- Amazon Is Shutting Down Freevee, Its Ad-Supported Video Streamer
- “Breathe” Review
- “Transformers One” Review
- Captain America: Brave New World | Official Trailer
- Marvel Studios’ Thunderbolts* | D23 Brazil Special Look | In Theaters May 2, 2025
- Mattel apologizes after mistakenly printing porn site on ‘Wicked’ movie dolls packaging | CNN Business
- Music Video DB
Which super villain built this?
It reminds of the pirate island in The Life Aquatic, but without a beach.
abandoned? dibbs!
I’d live on that.
Come the zombie apocalypse, this is where I’m headed.
Don’t you know zombies can swim?
Can’t they just float?
Float, yes. Swim, no. This is where the post-zombie-apocalypse phrase “like sniping floating zombies from an island fortress” comes from.
Why wouldn’t they be able to swim? They can run, they can walk. Why not swim?
It’s a false assumption that zombies can’t swim. As proved in 1979’s Zombie Flesh Eaters where a zombie attacks and kills a shark.
[img]http://cinemart-online.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/zombie_flesh_eaters_shark-565×242.jpg[/img]
As I understand it, dead bodies float largely because of air in the lungs (don’t quote me on this as I don’t plan to murder people and dump them in rivers I never really looked in to it). I’m assuming zombies don’t breathe so they would sink, depending on the depth of the water they could walk underwater though.
Bodies float mainly because of the central cavities filling up with gas as the tissue putrefies. A zombie would probably stay at the bottom for a while, then float to the top.
That’s pretty terrifying.
In the novel World War Z, they described hundreds if not thousands of zombies just walking out of the water onto beaches around the world. Great book.
Ah, Hashima Island… Ex undersea coal mine. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hashima_Island
And there are mines? hells yes, we will take it
LOL we all know that “Zombie Apocalypse” is just code for “Black Uprising” which will likely happen if Obama wins again and actually gets the race war he is attempting to start in full swing. In which case this is a great location as most n*ggers can’t swim.
Congratulations on your recovery from your labotomy. Your sentence structure is coming along very well.
You may want to be aware of the potential for infection. Keeping your head firmly embedded in your @...$$ isn’t a good idea with fresh sutures, not to mention the pressure it places on your skull.
Now is this racism some after effect of the surgery or have you always been a ignorant racist @...$$hole?
Don’t worry, you can use swear-words here, motherfucker
I try not to use profanity when dealing with people of limited mental skills, it tends to get them confused and agitated.
And since he decided to try to thinly disguise his racism, I echo that in my reply.
If you wish to use expletives in your post, knock yourself out. I’ll apply them when necessary, with precision.
But you did use it, you just spelled it with symbols that looked like the letters instead of the letters themselves. It still counts.
As my contemporary, Luke, pointed out, you did in fact use swear words in your post. You just looked like a fucking dumb shit faggot six year old bitch faced cunt who likes to drink piss when you did it.
However, I agree with your criticism of Mr. blaze81. He is a cocksucker to the degree at which all other cocksuckers will stop sucking cocks because of the incredible level of cocksuckery that douchewich has obtained through his immense butthurt and, of course, sucking and fucking of holy-fucking-shit-inspiring gigantic fucking dicks.
Asshole is a swear word the way a BB is a bullet. So if that is your criteria, OK I used a swear word. However you missed the comment echoing his attempt to disguise his racism by writing n*ggers with disguising @...$$hole.
rsixidor I hope your Tourettes therapy is working, it is rare for it to translate forward when typing.
Naggers can’t swim…?
So how’s being “you” working out so far? From here it looks pretty sad; your thoughts?
Lets set the record straight. I’d have a hard time calling myself a racist. I don’t hate Jews, Hispanics, Asians, Europeans, (Ok I don’t trust Muslims, but that’s not the same as hating), and I don’t hate all Blacks….just most of them. And it is not because of their skin color, and I don’t consider myself intellectually superior or better in any manner simply because I am white.
I do however, hate the black culture with a passion. Any culture who worships thugs, criminals, drug dealers, and goes out of their way to not raise their children, to immerse themselves in the gangster culture are simply savages. They are devolving in front of us. Also, I don’t hate all of them. There are some very hard working, respectable, trustworthy, and intelligent blacks out there who I would personally give the shirt off of my back to help.
Also, lets call a rose a rose. My original comment was downvoted because I had the balls to call out the Obama worshipers, and we all know that this site is full of Liberals who would literally stab and beat each other for the chance to sniff his balls. This had nothing to do with race, and everything to do with the Obama comment.
Obvious troll is obvious –
Hitler had a hard time calling himself a racist too. So did the leaders of the Confederacy. So your in great company there. Thug culture, while predominantly black, certainly isn’t exclusive to them. There are a lot, and I mean A LOT of white boys who think being a “gangsta” is where it’s at. FYI last guy who tried to start a race war was a white guy named Charles Manson.
Way to back pedal and go nowhere. I don’t hate all Blacks just most of them. REALY!?
The items you contribute to Black culture, exist in every culture. So you’re stating you hate most Blacks. So if you’re basing that on Blacks you have actually interacted with, that poses the question concerning the people you choose to deal with and your actions.
Don’t dig yourself in any deeper.
The whole place is condemned and dangerous….too bad, what a great location for a film…or my new build for a vacation spot !
It’s been open since 2008 I believe. You can go there.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hashima_Island
COOOOOLLL
Once again the athiests get it all wrong. It isn’t the questioning God that gets the punishment. It isn’t even the doing wrong. It is refusing to accept that God is real and that he died for your sins that gets you sent to hell.
Reply
(UID# ) Well-loved. Like or Dislike: 7 2
September 20, 2012 at 9:56 am
What I love about this impassioned plea is that you don’t refute the key problem that the poster is pointing out (i.e. loving Deity who has set up a way for you to be tortured forever), just the WAY that you will be tortured forever.
So the poster should actually read “I love you, but if you don’t accept that I exist despite any demonstrable proof, if you formulate any ideas that weren’t coneived of two millenia ago, I will torture you forever in waysyou can’t imagine.”
If it read that, aces. Did I get it wrong?
Reply
hochunk (UID# 5604) 3 1
September 20, 2012 at 2:21 pm
If God gave us the capacity for Original Sin, Then any disbelief in Him is kinda His fault, isn’t it?
Reply
(UID# ) Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike: 2 5
September 20, 2012 at 8:52 am
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
pretty lame statement lol
Reply
npbnjvsxynpsff (UID# 44655) Well-loved. Like or Dislike: 4 0
September 20, 2012 at 11:11 am ? Baby don’t hurt me. Don’t hurt me no more. ?
Reply
dallasalice (UID# 16723) Well-loved. Like or Dislike: 4 0
September 20, 2012 at 11:27 am Sort of out of the blue I suppose, but I wonder what the atheists here think of the whole free speech argument over the Islam-insulting film that allegedly, but actually did not, set off the embassy attacks overseas. The head of the UN said that he believed in free speech except in causing hurt and insult to others, and the LA Times, and several high-profile folks in entertainment and politics have said the film-maker needs to be punished for insulting Islam – well, inflaming things anyway, making the “crying fire in a theater” argument. There are even calls for international laws against insulting religious figures, including Mohammad, Buddha and Jesus. So in light of that, where do you guys stand? I mean you’re never gonna see Christians attacking embassies or calling for the arrest of atheists when they “attack” Jesus or Christianity. Sure they moan and groan and get a prayer circle going for you which I know is annoying, but past that you can be pretty sure you are safe. But what if they start passing laws that say you can’t post things that attack religion? Any religion including the horror that is Christianity. What WILL you guys do for fun on the internet then? Or seriously, what will you do about it at all? And before you say, bullshit, it will never happen, I strongly suggest you rethink that. Once they started calling things “hate crimes” they opened a big damn door because any thought can be described by someone else as hateful and therefore any statement can as well. I’ll end by saying I assume you guys are a tad concerned about this trend. I know I am because no matter how offensive the speech one should have the right for the government not to restrict it.
Reply
korinthian (UID# 3174) 0 1
September 20, 2012 at 11:44 am
I’ll take a shot at answering some of that:
Streisand Effect.
Reply
dallasalice (UID# 16723) 2 0
September 20, 2012 at 12:07 pm Oh yes, the more you try to ban speech the more if flowers, but that so far that has really only applied to the calls for free speech restrictions. No one, in the USA anyway, has passed laws restricting free speech against religion. Or kowtowed to foreign laws doing so. My question, though was I assume you are at least a little concerned that our current government, and indeed many of those who usually champion free speech, seem to be placing Islam in a special category. And since the only way that really sells is to ban all trash talk against religion – or at least religious figures – it seems to me that this would be of some concern to atheists as a group. Understand, korinthian, that even though you and I disagree on, well, pretty much everything, I respect your free speech rights and I want no one’s restricted.
Reply
dallasalice (UID# 16723) Well-loved. Like or Dislike: 4 0
September 20, 2012 at 12:09 pm My concern is we are moving towards actual laws against insulting religion. And if that happens you might as well say goodbye to free speech totally.
Reply
crewmanguy (UID# 47015) Well-loved. Like or Dislike: 4 0
September 20, 2012 at 1:04 pm Free speech should be defended, even if we don’t agree with what is being said.
Reply
insanonaut (UID# 179180) 0 1
September 20, 2012 at 2:41 pm The Crusades.
Reply
npbnjvsxynpsff (UID# 44655) 0 1
September 20, 2012 at 3:27 pm “…I wonder what the atheists here think of the whole free speech…”
Well, I’m no atheist but…
If that speech is just trolling for the sake of trolling, pissing others of, etc., then it’s not speech, so…
“I mean you’re never gonna see Christians attacking embassies or calling for the arrest of atheists when they “attack” Jesus or Christianity.”
They had their “5 minutes” of “fun and games” in them Middle Ages. Islam is +/- 600 years “behind” them, hence “the fun and games” now.
“…you are safe…”
Nope. People who “believe” instead of thinking, aren’t close to safe, vide all the fuck up cults, people. Does David Koresh ring any bells ? Didn’t Timothy McVeigh believe in Adonai, and took the last sacrament ? How about the “new kid” on the religion block Scientology ?
The Bible didn’t change since the Middle Ages, so the possibility of another Dark Age is still there.
As for the ban of religion criticism, and religions in general, I do hope that someday people will have it enough, and religions will lose their “divinity”, thus becoming just another philosophy.
Reply
korinthian (UID# 3174) 0 1
September 20, 2012 at 3:53 pm
“If that speech is just trolling for the sake of trolling, pissing others of, etc., then it’s not speech, so…”
You’re wrong: That’s when free speech is the most important.
Reply
(UID# ) 1 1
September 20, 2012 at 3:29 pm
Fuck myths.
Free speech. *Always* and *forever*.
Reply
stolid (UID# 1669) 0 0
September 20, 2012 at 5:25 pm
I’d just go to /b/ where you can say and do almost anything.
Reply
(UID# ) 4 2
September 20, 2012 at 12:02 pm
From an atheist: free speech good, crazy people bad. Those zealots would be zealots about anything, they just have religion and have been coerced to be this way. They could of been coerced into this because the stay puff marshmallow man was melted by egon for their sins.
You don’t get to be tip toed around because you are crazy, we get you help and pop-sickles that you are not allowed to run around while eating.
Reply
outlanderssc (UID# 17653) Well-loved. Like or Dislike: 4 0
September 20, 2012 at 1:53 pm It could be noted that there are numerous religions that don’t believe in eternal suffering for sinfulness.
In fact, it doesn’t even exist in the Bible. According to Revelations after you die you wait for judgement and the “book of life” will be opened to you and God’s plan revealed – if you then reject God you are cast into the lake of fire and destroyed, no eternal suffering.
So eternal suffering is not really a solid argument for Atheism.
Reply
bstaples (UID# 6783) 1 1
September 20, 2012 at 4:08 pm
No, let’s not note that. It’s easier to make sharable pictures on the internet if we use concepts not found in the bible or if we grossly deform/over-simplify content.
Reply
korinthian (UID# 3174) 2 0
September 20, 2012 at 4:12 pm
It’s easier to live with our religion if we use concepts not found in the bible or if we grossly deform/over-simplify content.
Reply
(UID# ) 0 0
September 20, 2012 at 8:29 pm
BIG DICKS UP THE BUTT. I AM BACK TO RULE YOU ALL SHUT UP IM FAMOUS IM WOOPIE GOLDBURG I WILL DESTROY YOU ALL YOU WILL FEAR ME AND BOW TO ME. NOW STICK YOUR FINGERS UP YOUR BUTTHOLE AND THEN SUCK THEM ALL DAY LONG, YES YES THIS MAKES HAPPY INDIAN TOILET HAPPY. THEN GO TO PUBLIC REST ROOMS AT THE MOVIES AND GO INTO RANDOM BATHROOMS TO EAT PEOPLES POOP FROM TOILETS WHO DIDN’T FLUSH. AND THEN BEG FOR PEOPLES POOP OUTSIDE. DO IT I DEMAND YOU TO. I AM THE KING OF YOU ALL KING WOOPIE GOLDBURG, FOOD WILL BE REPLACED WITH POOP, WE WILL ALL EAT POOP FROM NOW ON.
Reply
(UID# ) 0 0
September 20, 2012 at 8:32 pm
I wonder what the atheists here think of the whole free speech…”
Well, I’m no atheist but…
If that speeSort of out of the blue I suppose, but I wonder what the atheists here think of the whole free speech argument over the Islam-insulting film that allegedly, but actually did not, set off the embassy attacks overseas. The head of the UN said that he believed in free speech except in causing hurt and insult to others, and the LA Times, and several high-profile folks in entertainment and politics have said the film-maker needs to be punished for insulting Islam – well, inflaming things anyway, making the “crying fire in a theater” argument. There are even calls for international laws against insulting religious figures, including Mohammad, Buddha and Jesus. So in light of that, where do you guys stand? I mean you’re never gonna see Christians attacking embassies or calling for the arrest of atheists when they “attack” Jesus or Christianity. Sure they moan and groan and get a prayer circle going for you which I know is annoying, but past that you can be pretty sure you are safe. But what if they start passing laws that say you can’t post things that attack religion? Any religion including the horror that is Christianity. What WILL you guys do for fun on the internet then? Or seriously, what will you do about it at all? And before you say, bullshit, it will never happen, I strongly suggest you rethink that. Once they started calling things “hate crimes” they opened a big damn door because any thought can be described by someone else as hateful and therefore any statement can as well. I’ll end by saying I assume you guys are a tad concerned about this trend. I know I am because no matter how offensive the speech one should have the right for the government not to restrict it.
ch is just trolling for the sake of trolling, pissing others of, etc., then it’s not speech, so…
“I mean you’re never gonna see Christians attacking embassies or calling for the arrest of atheists when they “attack” Jesus or Christianity.”
They had their “5 minutes” of “fun and games” in them Middle Ages. Islam is +/- 600 years “behind” them, hence “the fun and games” now.
“…you are safe…”
Nope. People who “believe” instead of thinking, aren’t close to safe, vide all the fuck up cults, people. Does David Koresh ring any bells ? Didn’t Timothy McVeigh believe in Adonai, and took the last sacrament ? How about the “new kid” on the religion block Scientology ?
The Bible didn’t change since the Middle Ages, so the possibility of another Dark Age is still there.
As for the ban of religion criticism, and religions in general, I do hope that someday people will have it enough, and religions will lose their “divinity”, thus becoming just another philosophy I YOU EAT THE POOP ALL DAY LONG
Reply
(UID# ) 0 0
September 20, 2012 at 8:34 pm
Once again the athiests get it all wrong. It isn’t the questioning God that gets the punishment. It isn’t even the doing wrong. It is refusing to accept that God is real and that he died for your sins that gets you sent to hell.
Reply
(UID# ) Well-loved. Like or Dislike: 7 2
September 20, 2012 at 9:56 am
What I love about this impassioned plea is that you don’t refute the key problem that the poster is pointing out (i.e. loving Deity who has set up a way for you to be tortured forever), just the WAY that you will be tortured forever.
So the poster should actually read “I love you, but if you don’t accept that I exist despite any demonstrable proof, if you formulate any ideas that weren’t coneived of two millenia ago, I will torture you forever in waysyou can’t imagine.”
If it read that, aces. Did I get it wrong?
Reply
hochunk (UID# 5604) 3 1
September 20, 2012 at 2:21 pm
If God gave us the capacity for Original Sin, Then any disbelief in Him is kinda His fault, isn’t it?
Reply
(UID# ) Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike: 2 5
September 20, 2012 at 8:52 am
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
pretty lame statement lol
Fuck head, I don’t think you know where you are.
FUCK YOU
I AM WOOPIE GOLDBURG
This thread grew the weirdest boner.