Your argument is based on the assumption that I knew about the London Olympics. Not mentioning it in my gross generalization does not mean I said otherwise.

To make myself clear, I was referring more to Olympics in the past, when solid numbers are available. Also I was addressing Dallasalice’s point. Even with the London Olympics, they’re still mostly profitable.

If the sand in your vagina compels you to find a flaw in my argument, you could more accurately say I was ignorant of the profit and loss for the London Olympics.

In the future, please read what I write without jumping to conclusions.

You’re the one crying because I tried to coach you towards a more valid critique of me. Geez dude, I said I was wrong, more or less, and you’re still chomping at the bit.

Not really trying to insult you. We’ve talked before, and you seem to have this self righteous fury over everything. I was just pointing it out.

Also I pointed out I was wrong. Not a lot of butthurt there. Besides the point I was actually trying to make still stands, despite the London thing, but I think you really care.