Having never seen the image, yes, yes it was.
It coulda said anything under there, and with nothing to really guess from, “sussing” was not gonna happen.
Besides, as the previous poster mentioned, it was better before someone ruined it with the added text which made guessing what it said even necessary.
So much less funny than the original, uncaptioned image.
And yet, that graph is accurate.
How can we tell if the bottom of the graph is obscured by the added text? What is that axis labeled?
Original: 9gag.com/gag/50563
Ah, thanks.
Yeah, I like it better in the original, too.
Seriously? Even obscured, with one axis being “woof”, was it truly impossible to suss out the other?
Having never seen the image, yes, yes it was.
It coulda said anything under there, and with nothing to really guess from, “sussing” was not gonna happen.
Besides, as the previous poster mentioned, it was better before someone ruined it with the added text which made guessing what it said even necessary.