I did a shoot at the Rhode’s Cemetery in Austin Texas, and I found this tomb stone. As far as I can tell the child was buried without a name.
-
My[Confined]Space
Better Than Bread
Movies Coming Soon- Star Trek Books
- “Star Trek: Lower Decks #2” Review by Aiptcomics.com
- AFRO SAMURAI’S Takashi Okazaki Brings Manga Flair to STAR TREK: DEFIANT Comics
- Out Today: “Star Trek: Lower Decks (2024) #2”
- Out Today: “Star Trek #27”
- New Star Trek Book: “Star Trek III: The Search for Spock – The Making of the Classic Film”
- Happy 2024 Birthday to J.M. Dillard!
- “Star Trek: Picard: Firewall” Review by Theforgottenfiction.com
- RIP David A. McIntee
- John Jay Alumnus Derek Attico Discusses New Autobiography at Book Talk
- Preview of “Star Trek: Lower Decks #2”
- Movie Related Products
- ‘Subscribers Were Overwhelmed’: How Disney Made Streaming Profitable
- Silo ordered for full four season run
- “The Muppet Christmas Carol” Review
- Alex Garland at the BFI – The VFX in Civil War | Framestore
- STAR WARS FILIBUSTER: Patton Oswalt’s Rant Animated – Geek Week
- The WWE Network Is Officially Shutting Down Ahead Of Netflix Move
- “Deadpool & Wolverine” Review
- Kevin Smith Is Getting Closer and Closer to Dogma 2
- “The Garfield Movie” Review
- Disney Said to be Considering a Surprising Replacement for Bob Iger: EA CEO Andrew Wilson – IGN
- Music Video DB
This website brought to you by The Tiki Web Group Unless specifically mentioned, we have no clue where this content came from. Know where it came from? Post the link in the comments, and reap the glory! All comments and content are the sole possesion of the commenters and members of the community and do not reflect the opinions or values of MCS.
No one should be buried without a name. 🙁
It was probably still-born… so not baptised. And, for some people (specially way back then), not baptism no name, at least for a burial. Sad but true.
He probably was not a stillborn as according to the tombstone he lived for 3 days. However, I do agree that he would not be given a name until he was baptized.
Still-born and yet lived for three days apparently. I like you effort to take a little jab at religion, though.
Wasn’t a “jab at religion”. I was simply describing a situation. And I didn’t notice the “lived for 3 days” thing…
You should never name something you might have to eat.
Au contraire: Clyde was delicious.
Okay I lol’ed
This must be a joke: the last name is an anagram for @Tongue
Still born wouldn’t be a child that lived for 3 days. But back in the 1940’s they wouldn’t have to have named the baby. Or maybe it was born at home possibly.
Still happens. We get newborns in surgery a few days old and their names say “baby boy” or “baby girl” plus their last name.
There are still cultures where the community decides the name of the child after it’s been around for a while, or even places that keep the kid nameless until they chose their own.
Very good article post.Really thank you! Great.