As someone with PTSD, I’d have to agree with the above post in saying it’s wrong.
I’ve seen a lot of good men and women destroy their families, friends and own lives over PTSD.
Everyone has their own sense of humor, I get that. This is just my opinion and nothing more.
I think it is more than likely that the creator did not intend this to be humorous, but because human nature is so varied, someone will find it to be humorous.
It’s more likely that the original artist intended them to be a criticism or commentary on something to do with the military stuff.
basyc (#7215)
13 years ago
I must agree, as a veteran, this is in poor taste.
wrong
As someone with PTSD, I’d have to agree with the above post in saying it’s wrong.
I’ve seen a lot of good men and women destroy their families, friends and own lives over PTSD.
Everyone has their own sense of humor, I get that. This is just my opinion and nothing more.
I think it is more than likely that the creator did not intend this to be humorous, but because human nature is so varied, someone will find it to be humorous.
It’s more likely that the original artist intended them to be a criticism or commentary on something to do with the military stuff.
I must agree, as a veteran, this is in poor taste.
Perhaps it’s not humor. Ever thought about that, vets?
On the internet everyones a victim. Even you vets.
no, just you Puu.
You too, but you’re into S&M.
no u
I just found the origin, was not meant to be funny. Was an artistic tribute.
blogs.westword.com/latestword/2011/05/plastic_army_men_ptsd_colorado_springs_soldiers.php
Sorry, but I did LOL when I first saw this and I’m getting treatment for PTSD (really). Is that wrong?