Hmmm… I actually prefer Zoeys look. I find her more attractive than Emily. That is, speaking only to their physical appearance though, not anything else.

Can you define what you mean when you say “totally vanilla”?

Ah… Good description. Not what I was expecting, but definitely what I was looking for.

I don’t generally tend to associate a persons appearance with how kinky they might be in bed, but I could totally see Zoey being a complete freak in the bedroom. Actually, given a choice, this is more or less what I would prefer. 😀

It is interesting that people tend to classify kinkyness in such black and white terms. I agree with your presumption about many average people, in all likelihood, incorporating various levels of kinky into their sexual routines.

I think the reality of it is that within our society, there is a kinky continuum, with no true, properly defined cut-off point, except in the mind of the observer. I.E. What is kinky to one is absolutely normal for others.

It is a shame that so many women are denied satisfaction based on their own perception, or even false assumptions, of what they feel is acceptable by cultural/societal standards. Or that they believe that this should even matter. A real shame.

Anyway, So if I am understanding correctly, you consider Zoey’s wholesome, girl next door appearance to be an indicator that she will be a vanilla, boring madonna in the bedroom and in life?

Notwithstanding any presumptions about character based on appearance, I think what you are describing as Emily’s “starker” features are what makes her less attractive to me. I actually like stark features in many cases, however Emily’s particular combination of features just doesn’t feel right to me.

Ah. Understood.