And for you to call someone else’s creation garbage, deemed genius or not is beyond the realm of closed mindedness and ignorance.
not only are you SUBJECTING this ideal to your own personal opinion, you are re-enforcing that fact with bullshit comparisons.
both have different motives, therefore the circumstances behind why either is done is relative, therefore, you know less than the nothing you obviously know. for you to say you “know art” is an impossibility.
This is a great idea. Although it’s not at all art, it’s just plain vandalism.
Much like art, your comment is very much subjective.
+1 either way I look at it. I like vandalism.
Art isn’t as subjective as you might think. For example, the guy who paints Obama on a unicorn is a pure garbage peddler, and DaVinci pwns.
And for you to call someone else’s creation garbage, deemed genius or not is beyond the realm of closed mindedness and ignorance.
not only are you SUBJECTING this ideal to your own personal opinion, you are re-enforcing that fact with bullshit comparisons.
both have different motives, therefore the circumstances behind why either is done is relative, therefore, you know less than the nothing you obviously know. for you to say you “know art” is an impossibility.
I’m fairly certain that science has ascertained both “Obama Unicorn Jockey” and “Your Reply” to possess the same artistic value as purée’d toxic squirrel crap.
for you to say you “know art†is an impossibility.
How postmodern of you.
You’re confusing the category “art”, into which both the unicorn Obama guy and DaVinci fall, with its subset “good art”, which only contains DaVinci.