-
My[Confined]Space
Better Than Bread
Movies Coming Soon- Star Trek Books
- Happy 2024 Birthday to Christie Golden!
- “Star Trek: Voyager: 16 Seven Of Nine” Review by Deepspacespines.com
- Nana Visitor Joins Us to Talk About Her New Book – Star Trek: Open a Channel: A Woman’s Trek!
- Out Today: “Star Trek #26”
- Star Trek Strange New Worlds Asylum Book Review
- John Jackson Miller Books Ranked!
- “Star Trek: The Next Generation: Headlong Flight” Review by Lessaccurategrandmother.blogspot.com
- Jumping into Adventure with “Into the Void”
- Happy 2024 Birthday to Jim Johnson!
- “Star Trek: Strange New Worlds: Asylum” Review by Trek.fm
- Movie Related Products
- “Deadpool & Wolverine” Review
- Kevin Smith Is Getting Closer and Closer to Dogma 2
- “The Garfield Movie” Review
- Disney Said to be Considering a Surprising Replacement for Bob Iger: EA CEO Andrew Wilson – IGN
- Amazon Is Shutting Down Freevee, Its Ad-Supported Video Streamer
- “Breathe” Review
- “Transformers One” Review
- Captain America: Brave New World | Official Trailer
- Marvel Studios’ Thunderbolts* | D23 Brazil Special Look | In Theaters May 2, 2025
- Mattel apologizes after mistakenly printing porn site on ‘Wicked’ movie dolls packaging | CNN Business
- Music Video DB
pretty, does it come in wallpepper?
This doesn’t look like a Sovereign-class vessel. The secondary hull is wrong. It’s clearly Starfleet, though, and it’s a nice-looking ship.
On second thought, maybe it is the Enterprise-E. The angle is a bit funky.
I used to imagine every series possible as being a cross over with Transformers.
Starships from Star Trek were some bad ass motherfuckers in these day dreams.
@...RSIxidor:
Voyager had those totally pointless/awesome moving nascelles
@...tiki god: +
I of course do not recall this. The only series I watched a lot of was Deep Space Nine, and I loved it. Especially the Ferengis.
YOU STUPID FUCKING PLUS SIGN! YOU’VE SHOWN UP AGAIN HAVE YOU I WILL KILL YOU MEET YOUR NEMESIS: –
@...RSIxidor: Same here, I watched it as a kid, but as grew I saw it was silly.
Certainly not the Enterprise E. The nacelles are in the wrong position (below the primary hull) and the wrong shape. The Sovereign class nacelle has a trapazoidal cross-section with a ridge running down the length of the top of the nacelle. This clearly does not. Also, as noted above, the secondary hull looks wrong.
The new Star Trek Movie kicked uber ass. FYI
@lumps937: dork
Well, according to this: www.shipschematics.net/startrek/images/federation/galexploration_sovereign.jpg
it almost looks like it. The nacelles are rounder as lumps937 says. (937, is that your area code, in Dayton? The UFO code? [look at the phone and see what that spells…])
And it’s a weird angle, so the secondary hull could look like that.
Yes, I’m a Trek geek. And no, I did not go out and watch the movie yesterday or today, that will be tomorrow, unless my wife decides to go see the son in Savannah and his girlfriend, and then it will be Monday. I’m not dragging my wife through the thunderous crowds, she doesn’t like it.
@...tiki god: The sad thing is that I know why it had the movable nacelles. They were designed in response to scientific data showing that warp drive was damaging to subspace, as shown in TNG episode “Force of Nature”
@...MikeBabaguh:
Ship is not only off center, it’s upside down.
That is an Excalibur-class starship, which I believe is a fan-created ship…it’s bounced around the internet for a couple of years, I’ve seen it used as a battleship in third party modifications to Star Trek RTS games. A flatter and larger variant on the Sovereign-class.