Inside view of a swiss TOKAMAK
-
My[Confined]Space
Better Than Bread
Movies Coming Soon- Star Trek Books
- Happy 2024 Birthday to Tony Isabella!
- “Star Trek: Lower Decks #2” Review by Aiptcomics.com
- AFRO SAMURAI’S Takashi Okazaki Brings Manga Flair to STAR TREK: DEFIANT Comics
- Out Today: “Star Trek: Lower Decks (2024) #2”
- Out Today: “Star Trek #27”
- New Star Trek Book: “Star Trek III: The Search for Spock – The Making of the Classic Film”
- Happy 2024 Birthday to J.M. Dillard!
- “Star Trek: Picard: Firewall” Review by Theforgottenfiction.com
- RIP David A. McIntee
- John Jay Alumnus Derek Attico Discusses New Autobiography at Book Talk
- Sexy Images of Sexy people
- your present is ready.
- Blue bikini
- My 18yo fish like face
- Do you prefer the smooth, sleek look of a one-piece, or do you love the freedom of separates?
- Blue bikini
- Don’t make me wait for toolong for your face
- and I’m showing you my crop top again
- Freckles make me look charming or is it just me?
- Abigaiil Morris
- This red dress hugs me in all the right places
- Movie Related Products
- “Galaxy Quest” Review
- ‘Subscribers Were Overwhelmed’: How Disney Made Streaming Profitable
- Silo ordered for full four season run
- “The Muppet Christmas Carol” Review
- Alex Garland at the BFI – The VFX in Civil War | Framestore
- STAR WARS FILIBUSTER: Patton Oswalt’s Rant Animated – Geek Week
- The WWE Network Is Officially Shutting Down Ahead Of Netflix Move
- “Deadpool & Wolverine” Review
- Kevin Smith Is Getting Closer and Closer to Dogma 2
- “The Garfield Movie” Review
- Music Video DB
- Tony Horses – Sarah [indie] [2024](Eva Knowles directed)
- Sam Novota — Bromance Forever [pop] (2024)
- Dylan Ebrahimian – Music for Violin Solo [Classical] [1973 / 2024] Composed by Daria Semegen
- Deep Space Hot Tub — Just a Father Christmas (Teenage Dirtbag) [Christmas Rock] (2024)
- Ritchie Crosdale – Lament for Bertie Ahern [Blues] [2024]
This website brought to you by The Tiki Web Group Unless specifically mentioned, we have no clue where this content came from. Know where it came from? Post the link in the comments, and reap the glory! All comments and content are the sole possesion of the commenters and members of the community and do not reflect the opinions or values of MCS.
My favourite physics engine.
Looks like a test fusion reactor…
For those, like me, who had no clue: Wiki: Tokamak Pretty cool.
Looks like the ugly brother of a TARDIS.
@...HoChunk:
Compared to the TARDIS, most things are ugly.
pfff. cold fusion beats this hands down.
Ohhhh, Tokamak. Please hurry up and become a feasible system of providing energy so that we may not have fossil fuels any more.
Miniature sun reactor FTW! Yay nuclear byproduct of WATER/HELIUM!
Mine better
If they put even 0.0001% the money into fusion reactor designs like the Farnsworth Fusor that they put into these monstrosities, we’d already have fusion power.
@...NoOneInParticular: Spending money on a project does not change the laws of physics. There are hundreds, maybe thousands of Farnsworth Fusors built (at least 0.0001% of the money spend on TOKAMAK has been spent on them), but none have gotten to Q=1. Without getting too technical, there is good reason to believe that inertial-electrostatic confinement will never break even.
But we already have solar power that’s available. Why are we re-inventing the wheel again?
@...Annarchy: Because we’re scientists, and that’s how we roll.
@...Annarchy:
@...AgZed:
SRSLY
Why create something that could be dangerous when we have awesomeness readily available?
@...AgZed: Here.Here.
@...Annarchy: @...RSIxidor: Science is about figuring out how the universe works. Solar power might be a better solution for energy production, but let’s study other things to just to see if they can work.
Why build one? Cause the sun is like 149,597,870,691 meters away from us right now. A tokamak can be in my backyard, generatin’ my energies.
Besides the fallout from a tokamak accident would really be quite small in comparison to other, heavy nuclear energy generation.
@The Matrix: Rebooted
Any link you might have to the technical details of why such a system will not break even? And also what about ITER?
@...reboot: After hundreds of [b]BILLIONS[/b] of dollars, Tokamaks haven’t reached unity gain either. There hasn’t been even ten million spent on Farnsworth Fusors. Also, magnetic deflection of charges around the acceleration grid shows great promise at finally breaking unity gain. And while there have been thousands of Farnsworth Fusors built, the vast majority are built by amateur researchers in their garage. It’s funny that something built for less than $500 in a garage shows more promise than a $10B Tokamak. 😀
@...QuantumStorm: Honestly, I can’t find one that would accessible without a university account. Try looking of some of Nevins’ work at LANL. He’s done some calculations that show IEC can’t get better than about Q=.1-.3.
@...NoOneInParticular: You have know idea what you’re talking about.
I’m really getting tired of arguing with clueless people who can’t even bother to google enough to get their figures in the right ballpark, but somehow think they’re smarter than all the scientists in the world.
@...RSIxidor: The spirit of inquiry is never satisfied with “good enough” or “that’ll do”. Human curiosity will always compel us forward, to make it (whatever “it” is), bigger/smaller, faster, cheaper. Better. Human progress has no limits, no line that we can draw and say “From here, we go no further.” So to your question of “Why?”, I give you the same answer that men & women of science have been giving since the first time the question was asked: Because we can.
@...reboot: I’m tired of arguing with brainwashed retards who don’t know what THEY’RE yammering about. I’ve got a degree in physics. I’ve forgotten more about both then you’ll EVER know. Quite a few of those scientists (those not bought by the billions handed out to hot plasma fusion projects) agree with me, and are becoming more vocal by the year as things like Tokamaks continue to fail to produce tangible results despite billions of dollars. Pull your head out of your ass and do some more research yourself. You’re clearly deluded, or bought and paid for. Your choice. 😛
@...RSIxidor:
@...AgZed:
So, just like mountain climbing: because we can. Hm. I suppose I am in the minority when I say that just because you can do something does not mean you should do it. Hadron collider, anyone?
@...Annarchy: Why shouldn’t we use the Hadron Collider?
@...HoChunk:
Oh, where to start? First reason: the guys running it have no idea what it will really do once it’s up and running. I am not comforted by the thought that some numbnut scientist will end the universe (and I know the odds are tiny that will happen) just to see what his shiny new toy does. It will be used to mostly prove and disprove theories, which is asinine in my opinion. At an expected cost of €3.2–6.4 billion, couldn’t they have used their giant brains to come up with a better way to spend that ungodly amount of money?
you are deeply stupid and i am glad you are not here anymore
Why are we still talking about this? the answer is clearly Dog shit
@...RSIxidor:
Truer words have never been seen on this site before.