Was reminded by someone in the Beavis & Butt-head discussion how the red cat & chihuahua contributed to society, so here they are.
First image from:
www.dmvcomics.com
Second image is just lulzy.
Was reminded by someone in the Beavis & Butt-head discussion how the red cat & chihuahua contributed to society, so here they are.
First image from:
www.dmvcomics.com
Second image is just lulzy.
Sht is so fucked, but funny as hell.
What the hell is going on in that top image?!
I don’t think I’ve ever seen a full episode of this. Was this an adult cartoon series, or geared towards kids?
@...tiki god:
Toward kids, nickelodian or hiver you spell it.
The original series was geared toward kids. Spike TV resurrected it and turned it into an obnoxious mess of gay/butt sex jokes.
“Would you like to buy some rubber nipples?”
I hated that show. Nothing remotely appealing about it. Then again, I hate SpongeBob for the same reason.
I hated it. It’s just too surreal and gross for my tastes.
This show is idiotic. I even hated it as a kid…
IMO you are an idiot if you watch such filth
I guess I’m an idiot. It was one of the first of it’s kind and it was truly gross, but I kept watching it…and it really kept pushing the line. I guess I kept watching it in shock & awe.
I often wonder what watching cartoons like this does to a childs mind…
@...Phyreblade: I assume similar effects that being around drugs/alcohol abuse/or aggressive and loud people would have, but with a bit of stupidity mixed in.
So, to sum it up, nothing good. But cartoons don’t really do anything to children unless they have very little to no social interaction.
@...casemods: To compare a silly cartoon to drug/alcohol abuse simply because you don’t like the cartoon in question is extremely childish and short sighted.
You must be a very good christian, judging anything you don’t like as “bad”.
@...outofocus: Yeah I can totally see how this cartoon could be good for kids…
@...outofocus:
I think cartoons are allowed to portray things that would be considered inappropriate, extremely violent, and adult only material had it be live action. You have to remember that kids are impressionable, and while to you and I, it is a silly cartoon, the difference may not be readily apparent to a child.
So I wouldn’t judge Casemods too harshly on the comparison, even though I probably wouldn’t have looked at it that way either. From my perspective, kids in general are very resilient, and can learn to cope with a wide array of experiences, both negative and positive, often times much better than adults do.
It’s been my experience that it is only when they experience these things unsupervised, with no parental guidance or training about how to differentiate what is good and bad, and more importantly, why things are good and bad, that things like this end up warping their minds.
The same can be said about being around people who use drugs and alcohol. Neither drugs nor alcohol are inherently bad things, but can lead to bad things if abused. This makes it important that kids with parents or guardians that use them to be taught why they can be bad, and how to avoid getting to that point, either verbally or (much more preferably) by example.
@...Phyreblade: That’s all nice and obvious. My point stands (which was less about the cartoon and about casemods judging things as “bad” because he personally doesn’t like them).
Whether or not Ren & Stimpy is bad for kids depends entirely on the children in question and how the parents of those children respond. Meaning parents need to know their child’s mental and emotional capabilities at interpreting different things.
As it is, since this cartoon has come out, kids are now able to access far worse. Ren & Stimpy is the least of our concerns.
Just because the show has no redeeming qualities doesn’t mean it’s bad. Not good =/= bad.
@...outofocus: Well even though I thoroughly disagree with his statement that anyone who watches Ren and Stimpy is an idiot, I didn’t actually see him say it was “bad”.
He said it was idiotic, which I thought was a valid statement. And his comparison to drugs and alcohol was a little extreme, but properly qualified and quite accurate.
So I guess I don’t really understand where you are coming from. And as Nyokki pointed out, not god=/=bad. Even though I think it isn’t the best thing we could be letting our kids watch, I can see how they might find it entertaining.
But I do agree with you about it being the least of our problems…
In short, if your kid is heavily-influenced on cartoons, you’ve failed as a parent. His/her biggest influence should be their parents or legal guardians.
I’m not saying they have to be carbon copies, lord knows I’m pretty different from my mother but when there’s a figure to help you tell what’s right and wrong (at least until you begin thinking for yourself) it helps.
Making the TV that “figure” shows that you’re not qualified to take care of a child.
That being said, I watched a lot of cartoons but none went over the top and the most “dangerous” ones were nowhere to be seen on local channels.
I came to love all these when I was a teen because then I could fully experience and appreciate all that I missed in my younger days.
How many people can say they aren’t under the influence of something when they find this show funny? That’s all I’m saying…
@...casemods: At least one.
Ok…let me rephrase my opinion.
This show is quite stupid in my opinion.
I would never let my child watch this, or anyone child I was watching for that matter.
If it shows anything, it’s how to be stupid and angry.
@...casemods: Too late for re-phrasing, I already made up my mind.
@...nyokki: lol…