@Phyreblade
If they used an instantaneous sampling method then they should provide a date/time rather than leave the ambiguity of the span of an entire year… Sorry, the nerd part of me isn’t agreeing with this presentation.
And yes, Billy Manic is correct. And if you’re just talking about the towers themselves, I’m sure that some of the rubble that took a while to clean up added up to more than 0 ft, especially when there were support beams standing that were over 10 ft tall.
ROW ROW FIGHT THE POWAH
ROW ROW FIGHT THE POWAH
the nerd part of me can’t help but agree with the presentation.
D :
uhh… how are we determining these heights? Because if its an average height throughout the year, then the 2001 should be about 1/4th shorter…
@Mystik
Actually I believe they probably used an instantaneous sampling method…
0 ft? But weren’t there 7 seven buildings, and a couple that still stand?
@Phyreblade
If they used an instantaneous sampling method then they should provide a date/time rather than leave the ambiguity of the span of an entire year… Sorry, the nerd part of me isn’t agreeing with this presentation.
And yes, Billy Manic is correct. And if you’re just talking about the towers themselves, I’m sure that some of the rubble that took a while to clean up added up to more than 0 ft, especially when there were support beams standing that were over 10 ft tall.
@Mystik
Indeed, I can understand your frustration… But listening to your inner nerd will cause you great suffering here… in teh intarwebs zoen… LOL