i had a response to this “thread,”
since i like webcomics, am easy to amuse, and take a measure of pleasure at seeing them reference other phenomena that i am amused by, annoyed by, or can simply relate to.
However, I remembered that own the complete Calvin and Hobbes set, and my time would be better spent thumbing through it again.

Taking self important stands on what is essentially a matter of differing tastes
might be the stupidest form of internet arguing, an already retarded endeavor.

well, CLEARLY i was waffling on my stance concerning the issue.

i cared mildly about the subject, but thought the argument dumb, which reminded me of Calvin, which made me want to share the quote it had made me think of, which made me leaf through my collection, which made me all warm and fuzzy inside, which made me feel like it was STUPID to ARGUE about freaking COMICS when you could be enjoying the ones you like, and not bothering with the rest.

i was just talking about the absurdity of taking such an angry stance something that has no “right” or “wrong” when you could just be out enjoying the things you DO like instead.
Luckily, I happen to like playing Internet Argument Bingo, and with your “hypocrisy,” i’m one Hitler reference short of $20 and a free pizza coupon!
Wheeee!

I agree with you about C&H being exceptional- i prefer webcomics- i can’t even read the paper anymore, however, i wasn’t proclaiming it was superior or anything- just that it made happy, and put the argument in perspective.

As for arguing, just because i think that it’s stupid doesn’t mean i don’t enjoy it myownself. Why even bother commenting here otherwise?

The trick is not to put value in being
right, but in pissing people off.
That may contradict what i said earlier,
but that was like 45 minutes and a couple highballs ago.