On points 1 and 3 I agree with Obama in full. On point two, I’m afraid I’m going to have to trust the legislation itself over some blog. So here’s all the Illinois legislation in 1999 regarding sex offenders, with full text:

www.ilga.gov/legislation/legisnet91/sbgroups/sb/910SB0943LV.html
As part of a series of amendments, protects the anonymity of victims of sexual offence.
www.ilga.gov/legislation/publicacts/fulltext.asp?Name=093-0977
An act concerning registering sexual offenders.

Seriously, I looked and looked. I’m not a lawyer specializing in Illinois criminal law so maybe I missed something, but there doesn’t appear to have been any Illinois law in 1999 regarding the sentencing of sexual predators, only the registration of released sexual predators, specifically in relation to those from other States or Countries that have arrived in Illinois, an act which Obama did vote for. So actually that thing you posted, Iddq, is the exact opposite of true.
.
As for that blog: lol. First off, all the links lead to adds. They look like they link to sources, but no. No primary sources. It also seems to take a pretty strong stand against abortion for a guy who headlines his blogs with ‘limited government’. My understanding of the legal philosophy behind limited government is that when a topic is controversial, the government takes the action which would have the least effect on the public (ie, no legislation). Spending most of your blog actively petitioning to ban something is the exact opposite of limited government. Is today opposite day in the USA and not Canada? Because we seem to be living in crazy opposite land quite a bit, here, don’t we, Iddq?
.
Way to fail again, Iddq.

1) I don’t really care about porn. Guess what? Adults have sex. I used to live in a country where you’d see full-frontal nudity all the time on TV and noone giggled and got uncomfortable.
2) I don’t support big government. Abortion is a controversial issue, and in controversial issues the government should not interfere. I personally find all abortion repulsive, but at the current time, it’s just not the place of the State to do anything about it.
3) Read closer. Victims get anonymity, so that kids that have already been buttfucked aren’t made into a media circus and thus don’t get their lives ruined more. The other bit of legislation was a registry programme, so all neighbours, etc, of a sexual predator convicted out of state know what a creep he is and ostracize him. Learn to read, fag.
4) Moderate/Independent Americans? Hahaha hahahahhahahaha
.
hahahahahahhahaha
.
ahahahhahahahha
.
Seriously, you’re a nation of sheep that eat 3 cheeseburgers and day.

… life. The children in Portugal were very polite and well mannered. They called me ‘Senhor’ or ‘Doutor’ or ‘Professor Doutor’ and waddya know, lower teen pregnancy rates than the US. Last time I was in Montana, the local kids were smoking up and throwing shovels at a pile of snow over and over again.

2) Yeah, your house. Public institutions should be the opposite of censored. I believe it’s called ‘freedom of information’. Believe it or not, the world isn’t geared toward your own personal comfort. Education involves learning about the bad as well as the good. Forcing ignorance upon yourself in the name of some pussy sense of decency is intellectual and ethical cowardice. Maybe if you had a well-rounded education, you would learn to read.
.
3) So what you’re saying is that victims of sexual abuse (the children) should be made the victims of a media circus? Why? ET a little slow tonight? Contemplating the emptiness or your life? Need another buttfucked kid to laugh at?