Is this from Zeitgeist? Here’s a clue kids: when someone is talking about a “conspiracy of elite bankers” without specifying who is and isn’t part of the conspiracy, they are full of crap. Are the subprime mortgage companies part of “the elite” bankers? How about Lloyds of London? If so, why did they go bankrupt?
How about all the Asian economies? Is Japan controlled by Jewish bankers?
I cannot even imagine the lack of critical thinking that would lead someone to believe Zeitgeist has any credibility.

The actual New World Order will start in 2011, when Native American Tribes rise up and used Ghost Dance magic to defeat the US Military. At the Treaty of Denver, most of the the western US and Canada are ceded to the Natives and partitioned into Tribal Nations. After that California forms its own country and the Confederated States also secede from the Union. The remaining United States and Canadian Provinces join together to form UCAS, except Quebec which remains independent. Seattle and Denver remain free cities.
Global Warming causing massive flooding the Amazon effectively causing South America to become an archipelago.
Japan becomes a major empire, taking over most of Asia and San Fransisco.
I don’t know what happens to the rest of the world, because I didn’t buy the other sourcebooks.

@njch412,
HAHHAHAHAHHAHAHHAA
when was the last time you say a Made in the USA label on anything?
What’s the trade deficit at these days?
What percentage of scientists in the US are foreign nationals?
The USA is not even “sustaining itself at a technologically advanced level” right now.
HAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAH

yeah, I typed “say” instead of “saw” because I was busy literally laughing out loud. you get a gold star at spelling, asdf.
reasons why scientists come here are not important. njch412 claimed that the North American Union would be “capable of sustaining itself at a technologically advanced level”, I countered that the current level requires people, good and services from other nations and therefore isn’t self-sustaining. I’m still trying to figure WTF you’re adding to the conversation. what do you want proof of?

“I want to see if Americans, when under the punches, will actually stop stuffing their faces with hamburgers while watching reality TV and posting on the internet about their entitlement issues/exceptionism delusions to actually save their sinking ship.”
I’ve thought about this a lot, here’s what I’ve come up with: the traditional Hispanic lifestyle (many generation living together and pooling resources) will be more effective at responding to the upcoming recourse shortage than the typical Anglo lifestyle. In a couple of generations the US and Mexico will be virtually indistinguishable. In a few centuries the entire European colonization of the Americas will be viewed the same we that we look at the Muslim occupation of Iberia: a temporary incursion that lasted a few generation and was eventually overcome by the native population.

@asdf,
“i want you to prove it. so answer your questions or your not really saying anything relevant or was it those four insightful questions and i just messed up.”
No, I refuse to answer those questions. I’ve done my own research and come to my own conclusions, you should too. I consider it a kind of Socratic Method.

“why do you think this is true and how will it happen?”
Speculation based on extrapolating current trends and comparing with historical analogues. Does my speculation worry you? if so why? What do you think the world will be like at the end of the 21st century?

“also how many hispanic families have you met to make your claim?”
dozen, maybe hundreds, in both the US and South America. But I don’t need to meet a single person to come to that conclusion, I just need to compare statistics of average household sizes.

“also learn to spell.”
Learn to use punctuation.

Also, your reply to Caio is the type of response I expect from a 13-year-old, that adds nothing to conversation. It’s a metaphor, ferchristsake.

@slakinator
How did you know my recipe for a post??? I thought it was a family secret.

“i came to my own conclusions and i think america will be fine i also refuse to give any reason about my conclusions and research.”
“i actually wanted you to tell me the trends and analogues you used so i could see how you were thinking. one example is not enough.”
So you’re not going to contribute any original thought of your own, but you are going to make further demands that I support my practically self-evident speculation?
Sorry, asdf, you just became too boring to talk to right now.