Filed under “Science?” Is it because this picture was rendered with a computer? Can’t tell for sure, but something in the picture looks unnatural to me. Deserves respect no matter how it was made.
This is not a CGI or computer render, I think; it’s a photo that’s been reworked. The light and shadow are too natural to be CGI.
But it has been heavily shopped to enhance the rust tones in the sky, echoing the ground and blown-out truck.
Not hard to do, just applying the right tint in the right way as a filter layer. It’s likely the truck was unremarkable, as was the sky and landscape (faded paint and steel against a blue-grey horizon), but then  that’s why we have Photoshop: To make the originally dull something worthy of note. Well-used in the hands of the capable, we get pictures like this one. It’s quite lovely.
Filed under “Science?” Is it because this picture was rendered with a computer? Can’t tell for sure, but something in the picture looks unnatural to me. Deserves respect no matter how it was made.
This is not a CGI or computer render, I think; it’s a photo that’s been reworked. The light and shadow are too natural to be CGI.
But it has been heavily shopped to enhance the rust tones in the sky, echoing the ground and blown-out truck.
Not hard to do, just applying the right tint in the right way as a filter layer. It’s likely the truck was unremarkable, as was the sky and landscape (faded paint and steel against a blue-grey horizon), but then  that’s why we have Photoshop: To make the originally dull something worthy of note. Well-used in the hands of the capable, we get pictures like this one. It’s quite lovely.
Why under “Science” I can’t guess.
Tiki must be drunk categorizing again
It’s because ol’ mother science is at work here rusting up the truck…. Geez….
My friend takes photos just like that.
www.bebo.com/PhotoAlbumBig.jsp?PageNbr=1&MemberId=5170054&PhotoAlbumId=5412151019&PhotoId=5413918670