Atheism is not believing in a god or deity. Angels are aggelos (koine)or malakh (hebrew) not theos (koine) or elohah (hebrew). Get your disbeliefs straight.
Jeros:
I do not care what your religious beliefs are. However, your use of English does concern me. What one implies (disbelief in angles) and what one states (disbelief in gods) is not always the same thing. One could IMPLY that atheism also includes disbelief in rivers (which are venerated in some religions, as angels are).
Once again I must point out word meanings. Theism means: “the doctrine or belief in the existence of a God or gods” (from “theos” meaning: “god”). The word “religion” in not mentioned (in case you did not pick up on that). Learn to use a dictionary before you attempt to correct me.
BTW, I almost died in a fire. BUT Zombie George Peppard saved me!
EvilDon wins that one with brain power. Evil brain power.
I find it horny that in posting a picture of a light trick the poster felt the need to qualify that he didn’t believe in angels thus implying that in case anyone was wondering he doesn’t think that picture is a real angel?
If you think that’s a real angel I know a guy in Nigeria who is heir to 2 billion and just needs some money for legal fees in order to get it out of the secure Swiss bank account where it is being held. I also have magic beans.
The disclaimer was aimed to prevent a flood of idiots going “LOLZ RELIGIONFAG,” instead I get one idiot going “LOLZ GULIBALFAG,” great. At least it’s mAgnUS, who is sufficiently eloquent and an accomplished troll.
Evildon; rivers are an undeniable facet of the real world easily demonstrated to the staunchest of skeptics. Angels are a facet of several different mythos all of which depend on one or more gods/goddesses/divine forces. Please demonstrate to me how these two things relate in your argument, because I fail to see how you can claim a river should not exist to an atheist.
Unless perhaps you think there is an organism with the traits of an angel behind the myths? Because I’m highly skeptical that that could honestly be your position.
Jeros
Atheism is not believing in a god or deity. Angels are aggelos (koine)or malakh (hebrew) not theos (koine) or elohah (hebrew). Get your disbeliefs straight.
Cool pic though.
The more you know!
you mean you can be athiest and still believe in angels? Doesnt the whole thing go part and parcel?
Looks alot like Tyrreal off of Diablo 2 no?
EvilDon: you fail.
Atheism is A(without or against) Theism(religion)
Angels are all part of a mythos or religion, and therefore outside of my belief system.
Quit trying to sharp shoot me. Also, Die In A Fire.
Who cares, angels are cool!
Jeros:
I do not care what your religious beliefs are. However, your use of English does concern me. What one implies (disbelief in angles) and what one states (disbelief in gods) is not always the same thing. One could IMPLY that atheism also includes disbelief in rivers (which are venerated in some religions, as angels are).
Once again I must point out word meanings. Theism means: “the doctrine or belief in the existence of a God or gods” (from “theos” meaning: “god”). The word “religion” in not mentioned (in case you did not pick up on that). Learn to use a dictionary before you attempt to correct me.
BTW, I almost died in a fire. BUT Zombie George Peppard saved me!
EvilDon wins that one with brain power. Evil brain power.
I find it horny that in posting a picture of a light trick the poster felt the need to qualify that he didn’t believe in angels thus implying that in case anyone was wondering he doesn’t think that picture is a real angel?
If you think that’s a real angel I know a guy in Nigeria who is heir to 2 billion and just needs some money for legal fees in order to get it out of the secure Swiss bank account where it is being held. I also have magic beans.
The disclaimer was aimed to prevent a flood of idiots going “LOLZ RELIGIONFAG,” instead I get one idiot going “LOLZ GULIBALFAG,” great. At least it’s mAgnUS, who is sufficiently eloquent and an accomplished troll.
Evildon; rivers are an undeniable facet of the real world easily demonstrated to the staunchest of skeptics. Angels are a facet of several different mythos all of which depend on one or more gods/goddesses/divine forces. Please demonstrate to me how these two things relate in your argument, because I fail to see how you can claim a river should not exist to an atheist.
Unless perhaps you think there is an organism with the traits of an angel behind the myths? Because I’m highly skeptical that that could honestly be your position.
Ah, I now understand the purpose of the disclaimer. You were not trying to be an idiot, you just wanted the idiots off your back. heh
As to my river/angel thing, it was a hyperbole.
And do I “think there is an organism with the traits of an angel behind the myths?” No. However, do know people who do…
I just am a little fussy with words and how they are used. :/